midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
297 P.3d 573
Utah
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Move to Amend Salt Lake submitted an initiative petition to place an advisory measure on local ballot, styled as a constitutional amendment to declare corporations are not people.
  • Salt Lake County Clerk certified signatures and delivered petition to Salt Lake City Recorder for ballot submission.
  • City Recorder rejected the petition as not constituting proper local legislation under Utah law.
  • Caleb Proulx, a Salt Lake City registered voter, sought extraordinary relief to compel placement of the petition on the November 2012 ballot.
  • Court denied Proulx’s petition on July 31, citing the petition’s advisory nature and lack of binding legislative effect.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether popular initiative can include purely advisory measures Proulx argues advisory initiatives fall within initiative power City/State argue advisory measures are not ‘legislation’ under Article VI No; advisory measures are outside the initiative power.
What constitutes “legislation” under Utah Constitution Article VI Text supports broader, non-binding guidance Legislation requires binding law with general applicability Legislation must have binding legal effect; advisory resolutions are invalid.
Separation of powers and initiative power People should be able to express policy opinions via initiative Initiative power is limited to legislation; opinions are not law Separation of powers limits initiative to legislation, not mere advisory expressions.
Impact of First Amendment on advisory initiatives Advisory initiatives are protected speech No constitutional right to place advisory questions on ballots First Amendment does not require advisory initiatives on ballots.

Key Cases Cited

  • White v. Welling, 57 P.2d 703 (Utah 1936) (initiatives must resemble a law; not merely opinion)
  • Salt Lake on Track v. Salt Lake City, 939 P.2d 680 (Utah 1997) (official may reject petitions lacking legal sufficiency or subject matter)
  • Carter v. Lehi City, 2012 UT 2 (Utah 2012) (defines legislative power and its limits; not all measures are ‘legislation’)
  • Mouty v. Sandy City Recorder, 122 P.3d 521 (Utah 2005) (cases distinguishing legislative vs. administrative acts for referenda/initiative)
  • Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (U.S. 1988) (ballot-access restrictions and First Amendment considerations)
  • Protect Marriage Ill. v. Orr, 463 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2006) (no constitutional obligation to place advisory questions on ballots)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Proulx v. Salt Lake City Recorder
Court Name: Utah Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 18, 2013
Citations: 297 P.3d 573; 726 Utah Adv. Rep. 29; 2013 UT 2; 2013 Utah LEXIS 2; 2013 WL 204762; 20120521
Docket Number: 20120521
Court Abbreviation: Utah
Log In