midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
130 F.4th 56
3d Cir.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Promise Healthcare Group, LLC and affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 5, 2018.
  • Patrick Wassmann, an alleged victim of medical malpractice at a Promise facility in 2017, filed a $10 million proof of claim on January 4, 2019, before the claims bar date.
  • The Trustee later moved to disallow Wassmann’s claim as time-barred, arguing the limitations period had expired by the objection date.
  • The bankruptcy reorganization plan was confirmed September 17, 2020 and went into effect October 1, 2020; the automatic stay lifted at plan effective date.
  • The Bankruptcy Court denied the Trustee's motion for summary judgment, holding the claim was valid as of the petition date and Wassmann didn't have to file a separate state court action.
  • The Trustee directly appealed, resulting in this appellate decision affirming the Bankruptcy Court.

Issues

Issue Trustee's Argument Wassmann's Argument Held
Time for Evaluating Claim Validity Claims must be valid as of objection/evaluation date, not petition date Validity determined as of petition date per § 502(b) Validity determined as of petition date
Need for Separate State Court Filing Filing proof of claim is insufficient; must also file timely state action Timely proof of claim in bankruptcy is sufficient; no separate state action required No requirement to file state suit if timely claim is filed in bankruptcy

Key Cases Cited

  • Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S. 443 (2007) (Section 502(b)(1) makes available all non-bankruptcy defenses in bankruptcy)
  • United Sav. Ass’n of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd., 484 U.S. 365 (1988) (Post-petition interest not generally allowed; statutory interpretation of § 502(b)(2))
  • In re Trib. Media Co., 902 F.3d 384 (3d Cir. 2018) (Personal injury claims must be tried in district court unless parties consent)
  • Coello v. DiLeo, 43 F.4th 346 (3d Cir. 2022) (Purpose of statutes of limitations: avoid stale claims and unfair surprise)
  • In re Flanagan, 503 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2007) (Assessment of claim validity as of petition date under § 502(b))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Promise Healthcare Group LLC v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Mar 3, 2025
Citations: 130 F.4th 56; 24-2159
Docket Number: 24-2159
Court Abbreviation: 3d Cir.
Log In