869 F. Supp. 2d 556
D. Del.2012Background
- Principal Life sues Christiana Bank as trustee for the Lawrence Rucker 2007 Insurance Trust seeking declaratory relief and damages for alleged voiding of a life policy due to lack of insurable interest and misrepresentations.
- The Insurance Trust substituted as defendant in lieu of Christiana Bank; Principal seeks a judgment voiding the Policy for lack of insurable interest and for fraud.
- A prior Delaware district court ruling (2010) held the Policy void for lack of insurable interest; Delaware Supreme Court later addressed insurable interest questions in Price Dawe v. 2006 Insurance Trust.
- This federal diversity action applies Delaware law; material issues involve whether Rucker procured the Policy and whether the funding/trust structure invalidates insurable interest.
- There are genuine issues of material fact as to who funded the Policy, whether a third party induced the insured, and whether the Trust was properly created and funded by the insured.
- The court denies Principal’s motion for summary judgment on insurable interest.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a genuine issue about who procured the Policy and who paid the premiums? | Principal contends Rucker procured the Policy with third-party funding and Aery loan funds. | Insurance Trust asserts Rucker paid or funded via loan arrangements; third-party investors may not have funded. | Genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment. |
| Does the Policy constitute a mere cover for a wager lacking insurable interest? | Principal argues a third party used Rucker as an instrument to obtain the policy for wagering. | Insurance Trust/GUI deny such an arrangement and contend there is no proven third-party funding. | Material facts in dispute; cannot grant judgment. |
| Was the Insurance Trust properly created and funded by the insured, affecting insurable interest? | Principal challenges whether Rucker funded the Trust or whether GUI improperly formed/funded it. | Insurance Trust and affiliates dispute improper creation/funding; contested facts exist. | Genuine issues of material fact remain; summary judgment denied. |
Key Cases Cited
- PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust, 28 A.3d 1059 (Del. 2011) (insurable interest issues in STOLI cases; impact of funding on validity)
- Principal Life Ins. Co. v. Lawrence Rucker 2007 Insurance Trust, 735 F. Supp. 2d 130 (D. Del. 2010) (previous holding that policy lacked insurable interest at inception)
