Press Communications LLC v. Federal Communications Commission
875 F.3d 1117
D.D.C.2017Background
- Press Communications (WBHX) sought a minor modification to move its transmitter inland, which required swapping channels with Equity Communications (WZBZ) so Press could occupy 99.3 rather than 99.7.
- The FCC Media Bureau found two spacing defects: the proposed swap would leave Equity’s WZBZ short-spaced to (1) Atlantic City Board of Education’s WAJM (whose license had lapsed but remained operational) and (2) Delaware station WJBR (to which WZBZ was already grandfathered short-spaced).
- The Bureau gave Press 30 days to cure the defects; Press declined to cure or to seek a waiver, arguing the WAJM lapse made that spacing issue moot and that grandfathering covered the WZBZ–WJBR spacing.
- The Bureau dismissed Press’s application; the full FCC denied review. Press appealed, arguing (a) grandfathering permits the involuntary channel move of a short-spaced station without waiver and (b) the FCC improperly accepted WAJM’s late renewal (cut-off rule).
- The D.C. Circuit reviewed for arbitrary and capricious action and affirmed the FCC’s dismissal, resolving the spacing/grandfathering issue in the FCC’s favor and declining to reach the cut-off claim because the spacing defect alone sufficed.
Issues
| Issue | Press's Argument | FCC/Equity's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a grandfathered short-spaced station may be involuntarily moved to another short-spaced channel location without satisfying §73.207 spacing or obtaining a waiver | Grandfathered status exempts the station from the spacing requirement, so no waiver needed | Applications proposing channel changes must meet §73.207 at the proposed site; grandfathering does not automatically carry to a new channel—waiver required | FCC reasonably required compliance with spacing rules or a waiver; dismissal affirmed |
| Whether the FCC was required to deny WAJM’s late renewal under the cut-off rule because Press’s application was filed while WAJM’s renewal was lapsed | Because WAJM’s renewal was untimely at the time of Press’s filing, Press had cut-off rights and WAJM’s later renewal should have been barred | FCC accepted WAJM’s late renewal; Bureau processed renewal and recognized WAJM as operational; new FCC policies reduce such lapses | Court declined to reach this claim because the WZBZ–WJBR spacing defect independently supports dismissal; prospective challenge moot in light of subsequent FCC policy |
Key Cases Cited
- Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (agency interpretation of its own regulation entitled to deference)
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (arbitrary and capricious standard for agency action)
- SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 (court may only uphold agency decision on grounds the agency articulated, but may discern reasonable path)
- Rural Cellular Ass'n v. FCC, 588 F.3d 1095 (deferential review of FCC)
- Casino Airlines, Inc. v. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd., 439 F.3d 715 (agency need not craft perfectly clear decisions; courts may uphold if path reasonably discernible)
- Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc. v. SEC, 805 F.3d 289 (Chenery not violated where court-discussed reasoning supplements sparse agency explanation)
