History
  • No items yet
midpage
732 S.E.2d 676
Va.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • PSS sued GP after GP terminated its subcontract and joined Accenture for similar DLA work.
  • Noncompete covenants prohibited GP from certain Accenture/DLA work for 12 months post-termination.
  • Trial court found GP breached the noncompete by working for Accenture on DLA BSM-related tasks; awarded damages.
  • Trade secrets claim dismissed; tortious interference claim not proven; injunctive relief denied.
  • GP and PSS both appealed; court affirmed circuit court’s ruling on liability and damages.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the noncompete enforceable or overbroad? GP argues overbreadth/ambiguity. PSS argues clause narrowly drawn to protect legitimate business. Noncompete is unambiguous and enforceable.
Did GP breach the noncompete by working for Accenture on BSM-related work? GP breached by providing similar support to Accenture for DLA BSM. GP contends work was not on BSM program. GP breach supported by evidence that BSM and EBS were interconnected; liability found.
Was Cuccia's testimony admissible and properly weighty? Cuccia's testimony supported damages and funding basis. Testimony contained hearsay/speculative elements. Court did not err in admitting and weighing Cuccia's testimony; objections preserved and resolved.
Are lost profits damages for breach of noncompete proper and adequately proven? PSS entitled to lost profits for future DLA work. Damages speculative; no guaranteed future orders. Damages supported by track records and preponderance of evidence; not speculative.
Should injunctive relief be granted given damages? Inadequacy of monetary damages warrants injunction. No irreparable harm; damages adequate. No abuse of discretion; no irreparable harm shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • Omniplex World Servs. v. U.S. Investigations Servs., 270 Va. 246, 618 S.E.2d 340 (2005) (Va. 2005) (restraint on trade must be narrowly drawn for reasonableness)
  • Home Paramount Pest Control Cos. v. Shaffer, 282 Va. 412, 718 S.E.2d 762 (2011) (Va. 2011) (narrowly drawn reasonableness factors for covenants not to compete)
  • Appalachian Power Co. v. John Stewart Walker, Inc., 214 Va. 524, 201 S.E.2d 758 (1974) (Va. 1974) (damages measure for lost profits under contracts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Preferred Systems Solutions v. GP Consulting
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Sep 14, 2012
Citations: 732 S.E.2d 676; 111906
Docket Number: 111906
Court Abbreviation: Va.
Log In
    Preferred Systems Solutions v. GP Consulting, 732 S.E.2d 676