Potter v. BFK, Inc.
191716
| Va. | Jul 22, 2021Background
- Luck Stone operated a stone quarry and a sand-manufacturing system that included a Buell Classifier purchased from BFK and installed in 2007.
- Daniel Potter, an employee of Luck Stone, entered a silo to operate the airflow system; a hopper ruptured and Daniel was killed by falling material.
- In July 2017 Brian C. Potter (personal representative) sued BFK under Virginia’s Wrongful Death Act.
- BFK filed a plea in bar asserting the claim was time-barred by the five-year statute of repose, Code § 8.01-250, arguing the Buell Classifier was equipment or machinery (thus exempt) or, alternatively, that it was ordinary building material subject to repose.
- The circuit court found the Buell Classifier was ordinary building material and dismissed Potter’s claim as time-barred. Potter appealed.
- The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed, holding the Buell Classifier is equipment under Code § 8.01-250 and remanded for further proceedings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Buell Classifier is "equipment or machinery" (thus exempt from Code § 8.01-250) | Potter: classifier was not equipment but ordinary building material; claim is time-barred by five-year repose | BFK: classifier is equipment/machinery manufactured and supplied by BFK and therefore exempt from the repose limitation | Court: classifier is equipment under § 8.01-250 (manufacturer control, manuals, non-fungible, not structural); reversed dismissal and remanded |
Key Cases Cited
- Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 229 Va. 596 (1985) (distinguishes ordinary building materials from equipment; manufacturer control and warranties are key factors)
- Grice v. Hungerford Mech. Corp., 236 Va. 305 (1988) (electrical panel treated as an improvement to real property for repose analysis)
- Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Melendez, 260 Va. 578 (2000) (switchgear and circuit breakers characterized as equipment exempt from repose)
- Luebbers v. Fort Wayne Plastics, 255 Va. 368 (1998) (steel panels, braces, liners found to be ordinary building materials)
- Baker v. Poolservice Co., 272 Va. 677 (2006) (pool drain cover deemed part of the improvement to real property)
- Jamerson v. Coleman-Adams Constr. Inc., 280 Va. 490 (2010) (steel platform and pole treated as ordinary building materials)
- Royal Indem. Co. v. Tyco Fire Products, LP, 281 Va. 157 (2011) (sprinkler heads held to be equipment exempt from repose)
- Eberhardt v. Fairfax County Employees' Ret. Sys. Bd. of Trustees, 283 Va. 190 (2012) (statutory terms must be read in context)
- Llewellyn v. White, 297 Va. 588 (2019) (court’s approach to effectuating legislative intent and plain meaning)
