History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potter v. BFK, Inc.
191716
| Va. | Jul 22, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Luck Stone operated a stone quarry and a sand-manufacturing system that included a Buell Classifier purchased from BFK and installed in 2007.
  • Daniel Potter, an employee of Luck Stone, entered a silo to operate the airflow system; a hopper ruptured and Daniel was killed by falling material.
  • In July 2017 Brian C. Potter (personal representative) sued BFK under Virginia’s Wrongful Death Act.
  • BFK filed a plea in bar asserting the claim was time-barred by the five-year statute of repose, Code § 8.01-250, arguing the Buell Classifier was equipment or machinery (thus exempt) or, alternatively, that it was ordinary building material subject to repose.
  • The circuit court found the Buell Classifier was ordinary building material and dismissed Potter’s claim as time-barred. Potter appealed.
  • The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed, holding the Buell Classifier is equipment under Code § 8.01-250 and remanded for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Buell Classifier is "equipment or machinery" (thus exempt from Code § 8.01-250) Potter: classifier was not equipment but ordinary building material; claim is time-barred by five-year repose BFK: classifier is equipment/machinery manufactured and supplied by BFK and therefore exempt from the repose limitation Court: classifier is equipment under § 8.01-250 (manufacturer control, manuals, non-fungible, not structural); reversed dismissal and remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 229 Va. 596 (1985) (distinguishes ordinary building materials from equipment; manufacturer control and warranties are key factors)
  • Grice v. Hungerford Mech. Corp., 236 Va. 305 (1988) (electrical panel treated as an improvement to real property for repose analysis)
  • Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Melendez, 260 Va. 578 (2000) (switchgear and circuit breakers characterized as equipment exempt from repose)
  • Luebbers v. Fort Wayne Plastics, 255 Va. 368 (1998) (steel panels, braces, liners found to be ordinary building materials)
  • Baker v. Poolservice Co., 272 Va. 677 (2006) (pool drain cover deemed part of the improvement to real property)
  • Jamerson v. Coleman-Adams Constr. Inc., 280 Va. 490 (2010) (steel platform and pole treated as ordinary building materials)
  • Royal Indem. Co. v. Tyco Fire Products, LP, 281 Va. 157 (2011) (sprinkler heads held to be equipment exempt from repose)
  • Eberhardt v. Fairfax County Employees' Ret. Sys. Bd. of Trustees, 283 Va. 190 (2012) (statutory terms must be read in context)
  • Llewellyn v. White, 297 Va. 588 (2019) (court’s approach to effectuating legislative intent and plain meaning)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Potter v. BFK, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Jul 22, 2021
Docket Number: 191716
Court Abbreviation: Va.