History
  • No items yet
midpage
310 P.3d 1139
Or. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Portland Columbia Symphony seeks judicial review after an ALJ affirmed a notice of tax assessment for unemployment contributions.
  • The ALJ ruled petitioner’s core musicians were employees, not independent contractors, under ORS 670.600(2).
  • Petitioner argues its musicians were independent contractors and not subject to unemployment tax.
  • The court must decide whether the musicians meet the ORS 670.600(2) criteria for independent contractor status, focusing on direction/control and independently established business.
  • The court reverses and remands, finding the ALJ misapplied the criteria and that some musicians meet the independently established business test.
  • Key facts include contract forms labeling musicians as independent contractors, the nature of core positions, and representative musicians Hernandez, Bescond, Warton, and Hatton.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether musicians were free from direction and control Petitioner argues musicians controlled means and manner Department contends musicians were controlled by petitioner ALJ erred; musicians were free from control over means and manner (focus on results)
Whether musicians independently established a business Musicians meet at least three of five ORS 670.600(3) criteria None meet three criteria when applied to record Some musicians meet three criteria; the Department erred; remand to reassess status
Whether fixed-price contracts and hiring authority support independence Fixed-price contracts and hiring rights show independence ALJ concluded no independent operation Error; risk of loss and hiring authority support independence

Key Cases Cited

  • AGAT Transport, Inc. v. Employment Dept., 256 Or App 294 (Or App 2013) (direction and control and independent contractor framework applied by Oregon courts)
  • Avanti Press v. Employment Dept. Tax Section, 248 Or App 450 (Or App 2012) (oversee vs. control distinction in means and manner)
  • Oregon Festival of American Music v. Emp. Dept., 204 Or App 478 (Or App 2006) (fact-specific ORS 670.600 inquiry; independent contractor status vary by record)
  • Pacificab Co. v. Employment Dept., 187 Or App 693 (Or App 2003) (fact-specific ORS 670.600 inquiry; prior determinations not controlling)
  • Freeman v. Employment Dept., 195 Or App 417 (Or App 2004) (judicial review standards for ORS 183 contested cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Portland Columbia Symphony v. Employment Department
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Sep 5, 2013
Citations: 310 P.3d 1139; 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1079; 258 Or. App. 411; 2013 WL 4761045; T71202; A148492
Docket Number: T71202; A148492
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    Portland Columbia Symphony v. Employment Department, 310 P.3d 1139