midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 4918
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Diane Polivchak obtained a cognovit judgment against James and David Polivchak and the Polivchak Co. and pursued foreclosure on company real property.
  • A sheriff’s sale was scheduled for October 17, 2011, then rescheduled; a December 24, 2012 sale was eventually conducted after reappraisal.
  • The property sold for $445,000 to North Pearl II, L.L.C. on December 24, 2012.
  • Appellants moved to stay confirmation and vacate the sale based on Diane’s alleged failure to file a certificate of notice under Loc.R. 27 and on appraisal value disputes.
  • The trial court overruled the motions and confirmed the sale on January 25, 2013.
  • Appellants appeal asserting lack of proper notice under Loc.R. 27 and that the appraised value was unduly low; the appellate court affirms the trial court's decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether lack of a filed certificate of notice voids sale confirmation Polivchak argues Loc.R. 27 mandatory notice was not complied with. Polivchak Co. contends the lack of a certificate is a technical defect with no prejudice shown. Trial court did not abuse discretion; no prejudice from lack of certificate.
Whether the appraisal value supports vacating or rejecting the sale Polivchak asserts appraised value was unduly low and should invalidate the sale. Polivchak Co. contends appraisal undermines sale price; dispute over value. Court did not abuse discretion; objection waived by failure to timely object and lack of credible evidence of higher value.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ohio Savs. Bank v. Ambrose, 56 Ohio St.3d 53 (1990) (trial court retains discretion in confirming sheriff's sale)
  • Citimortgage, Inc. v. Hoge, 2013-Ohio-698 (8th Dist. 2013) (defects in objections to appraisal do not require reversal absent prejudice)
  • PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Prater, 133 Ohio St.3d 91 (2012) (notice by email may suffice when otherwise proper notice given; due process not implicated by technical defects)
  • Michigan Mtge. Corp. v. Oakley, 68 Ohio App.2d 83 (1980) (discretionary nature of sale confirmation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Polivchak v. Polivchak Co.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 7, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 4918; 99560
Docket Number: 99560
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In