History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 IL App (1st) 101847
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Judgment entered Sept 12, 2006, awarding $39,100 total damages ($30,100 to Marie, $9,000 to Joseph).
  • Postjudgment interest under 9% per annum accrues from judgment date until satisfied; issue whether tender stops accrual.
  • Defendant offered to tender payment via letters Feb 5–6, 2007, and again in 2009, but these did not clearly include interest.
  • Plaintiffs did not respond to tender offers (appealed Feb 20, 2007).
  • Trial court awarded interest from judgment date to Feb 6, 2007, treating Feb 6 letter as sufficient tender; appellate court later reversed.
  • Plaintiffs appeal to challenge sufficiency of tender and impact on interest accrual; matter remanded for recalculation of interest.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Feb. 6, 2007 tender was legally sufficient to stop interest Poliszczuk argues tender lacked interest, date, and full amount Winkler contends tender to pay judgment plus costs stopped interest Tender not sufficient; interest accrual not stopped
Whether plaintiffs’ silence waived rights to interest accrual plaintiffs’ nonresponse did not waive their rights silence could excuse tender under caselaw Nonresponse did not waive interest accrual; reversed and remanded
Standard of review for postjudgment interest and tender determinations Review should enforce mandatory 9% interest from judgment date Court has discretion on tender-related issues Discretionary review applied to tender timing; abuse of discretion found in tender determination

Key Cases Cited

  • Pinkstaff v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 31 Ill. 2d 518 (1964) (purpose of interest statute and ability to stop accrual by tender)
  • Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc., 133 Ill. 2d 458 (1990) (offers must include interest to be sufficient tender)
  • Niemeyer v. Wendy's International, Inc., 336 Ill. App. 3d 112 (2002) (sufficient tender must include interest and costs)
  • Casciola v. Gardner, 101 Ill. App. 3d 852 (1981) (tender may be excused if creditor rejects a sufficient tender)
  • Needy v. Sparks, 74 Ill. App. 3d 914 (1979) (tender excused where creditor rejects offer with no consideration of interest)
  • Cyclonaire Corp. v. ISG Riverdale, Inc., 378 Ill. App. 3d 554 (2007) (finding of fact standard for when tender was made)
  • River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co., 17 Ill. 2d 242 (1959) (valid tender must cover debt, interest and costs)
  • Longo v. Globe Auto Recycling, Inc., 318 Ill. App. 3d 1028 (2001) (statutory interest mandatory from date of judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Poliszczuk v. Winkler
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 9, 2011
Citations: 2011 IL App (1st) 101847; 962 N.E.2d 610; 356 Ill. Dec. 925; 1-10-1847
Docket Number: 1-10-1847
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Poliszczuk v. Winkler, 2011 IL App (1st) 101847