midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
510 B.R. 433
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed a voluntary Chapter 13 petition on November 5, 2007; plan confirmed February 27, 2008 with provision to pay all priority claims in full.
  • IRS filed a proof of claim totaling $59,509.33: priority, secured, and unsecured components, later reclassified the secured portion as unsecured after objections.
  • Debtors discharged under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a) on March 4, 2013; case closed and later reopened on October 7, 2013 to pursue claims.
  • Debtors filed a complaint on November 6, 2013 alleging IRS collection efforts violated the discharge order.
  • IRS moved to dismiss arguing Debtors failed to exhaust administrative remedies under 26 U.S.C. § 7433(d)(1).
  • Court adopts the Moore line of authority and grants the IRS motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies is required under § 7433 before bringing a § 7433 damages action. Debtors rely on non-jurisdictional view and other authorities to avoid exhaustion. IRS contends § 7433(d)(1) requires exhaustion prior to filing damages action. Yes; exhaustion required; dismissal upheld.
Whether exhaustion applies to actions for violating discharge under § 524. Debtors argue § 7433(e) exclusive remedy bypasses exhaustion. IRS argues exhaustion still governs petitions under § 7433(e). Yes; exhaustion applies to § 7433(e) claims; dismissal affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hoogerheide v. IRS, 637 F.3d 634 (6th Cir. 2011) (exhaustion required; not jurisdictional, but still necessary)
  • Galvez v. IRS, 448 F. App’x 880 (11th Cir. 2011) (exhaustion not jurisdictional; may fail state claim if not exhausted)
  • Kuhl v. U.S., 467 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2006) (after exhaustion, taxpayer may petition bankruptcy court for damages)
  • In re Graycarr, Inc., 330 B.R. 741 (Bankr.W.D. Ark. 2005) (Graham reasoning on exhaustion; exclusive-remedy per § 7433(e) debated)
  • In re Kight, 460 B.R. 555 (Bankr.M.D. Fla. 2011) (exhaustion requirement for § 7433 damages upheld)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pointer v. United States (In re Pointer)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia
Date Published: May 7, 2014
Citations: 510 B.R. 433; Bankruptcy No. 07-31070-JPS; Adversary No. 13-3090
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 07-31070-JPS; Adversary No. 13-3090
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. M.D. Ga.
Log In