History
  • No items yet
midpage
827 N.W.2d 124
Wis. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • PNC Bank, N.A. filed foreclosure against Bryan and Lora Bierbrauer, asserting it was the current holder of the note and mortgage and the Bierbrauers were in default.
  • PNC attached certified copies of the note and mortgage; both listed First Franklin as the lender.
  • The Bierbrauers answered, alleging the original loan was with First Franklin and demanded proof that PNC is the proper holder of the note and mortgage.
  • PNC moved for summary judgment supported by Custodio’s affidavit claiming PNC is the current holder and that the Bierbrauers were in default.
  • Initially, the circuit court denied summary judgment, finding Custodio’s affidavit did not establish PNC’s right to enforce the note; after reconsideration, the court granted summary judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does PNC have the right to enforce the note? Bierbrauers Bierbrauers PNC showed prima facie holder status; no genuine issue.
Do later documents establish PNC as bearer and enforceable holder? PNC Bierbrauers Yes; endorsements in blank made PNC bearer; right to enforce confirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hardy v. Hoefferle, 306 Wis. 2d 513 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007) (summary-judgment standard applied independently of trial merits)
  • Palisades Collection LLC v. Kalal, 781 N.W.2d 503 (Wis. App. 2010) (principles for evaluating whether genuine issues of material fact exist)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: PNC Bank, N.A. v. Bierbrauer
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Nov 20, 2012
Citations: 827 N.W.2d 124; 2012 Wisc. App. LEXIS 916; 2013 WI App 11; 346 Wis. 2d 1; 2012 WL 5846416; No. 2012AP456
Docket Number: No. 2012AP456
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.
Log In