Plan for Abolition of Council
38 A.3d 620
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.2012Background
- COAH was created as an independent, in but not of the Department of Community Affairs to implement the Mount Laurel affordable-housing mandate.
- COAH’s 12-member board included elected officials, housing-need representatives, a nonprofit builder, a disabled-advocacy member, a for-profit builder, and public-interest members with term protections and removal procedures.
- The Governor issued Executive Order No. 12 (2010) reviewing COAH; EO No. 20 rescinded EO 12 (2010).
- Legislation to abolish COAH (Senate Bill No. 1) failed after conditional veto; the plan here is the Governor’s reorganization plan 001-2011 abolishing COAH and transferring duties to the DCA Commissioner.
- The Governor argued the plan would reduce costs and consolidate affordable-housing responsibilities under a single regulatory body within the DCA.
- Fair Share Housing Center challenged the Governor’s plan, arguing the Reorganization Act does not permit abolition of an independent, in but not of agency like COAH.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether COAH is outside the Act’s reach as an 'in but not of' agency | COAH is in but not of the DCA; thus outside the Reorganization Act. | COAH is an agency within the Executive Branch and thus within the Act’s reach. | COAH is not subject to the Reorganization Act; abolition invalid. |
Key Cases Cited
- Mount Laurel II, 92 N.J. 158 (1983) (constitutional obligation to provide affordable housing)
- Mount Laurel I, 67 N.J. 151 (1975) (Mount Laurel doctrine foundation)
- CWA v. Florio, 130 N.J. 439 (1992) (separation of powers and executive power framework)
- Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1 (1972) (uphold of reorganization power and executive authority limits)
- In re Salaries for Probation Officers, 58 N.J. 422 (1971) (flexible separation-of-powers principles)
