History
  • No items yet
midpage
68 So. 3d 257
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Phillips appeals a trial court order awarding Wife attorney's fees in a modification proceeding following a final hearing on August 7, 2008.
  • At that hearing the court denied the modification and contempt, but directed Phillips to pay Wife's fees and costs, deeming him financially superior to contribute.
  • Phillips moved to vacate; the court again found him financially superior and later awarded Wife $8,250 in fees and costs on April 21, 2009.
  • The standard of review for attorney's fees in dissolution cases is abuse of discretion; §61.16(1) permits fees after considering financial resources, need, and ability to pay.
  • The court's two orders stated Wife's need was not addressed and did not include findings on Wife's need or the parties' abilities to pay, citing Baime v. Baime for requiring such findings.
  • The Fourth District Court reverses and remands for proper findings on need and ability to pay consistent with Baime and related authorities.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the award of Wife's attorney's fees lacked required findings on need and ability to pay Phillips argues need findings were absent Ford contends the court acted within its discretion Reversed; remanded for proper findings
Whether the trial court failed to apply Baime v. Baime requiring explicit financial-need findings Phillips asserts Baime requires such findings Ford asserts findings were implied by resources Reversed; remanded for explicit findings on need and resources

Key Cases Cited

  • Baime v. Baime, 850 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (reversal when court failed to consider parties' financial resources)
  • Sumlar v. Sumlar, 827 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (requirement to address both need and ability to pay)
  • Bohner v. Bohner, 997 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (need and ability to pay must be addressed; lack of findings reversible)
  • Derrevere v. Derrevere, 899 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (standard: financial need and ability to pay in dissolution fees)
  • Zahringer v. Zahringer, 813 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (need for showing wife's need as part of fee award)
  • Lord v. Lord, 993 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (abuse of discretion standard for fee awards)
  • Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980) (emphasizes consideration of financial resources in fee awards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Phillips v. Ford
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 24, 2010
Citations: 68 So. 3d 257; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18018; 2010 WL 4740314; 4D09-3978
Docket Number: 4D09-3978
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Phillips v. Ford, 68 So. 3d 257