History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phan v. ANDRE & BLAUSTEIN, LLP
309 Ga. App. 191
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Phan and International Farmers Market 1, LLP (collectively Appellants) contested an arbitration award won by Andre & Blaustein, LLP (A&B).
  • In August 2009, the parties consented to arbitration under Henning Mediation & Arbitration Service rules and Georgia Arbitration Code.
  • The arbitrator ruled for A&B; A&B moved to confirm the award; Appellants sought vacatur claim of potential conflicts by the arbitrator.
  • Appellants alleged the arbitrator failed to disclose prior associations and should have recused; trial court denied vacatur and confirmed the award.
  • Appellants argued the superior court misinterpreted the arbitration award’s monetary terms; the court later entered an amended judgment favorable to A&B.
  • Georgia Court of Appeals vacated the confirmation order, held no vacatur grounds proven, but remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the arbitrator should have been vacated for partiality Phan claims disclosable conflicts required recusal A&B contends no competent evidence of bias; no Henning Rules proven No vacatur; no clear abuse of discretion
Whether the award should be vacated for manifest disregard of the law Disregard of Henning Rules and improper disclosures Record fails to show manifest disregard of law No vacatur on this ground
Whether the superior court properly construed the arbitration award in the confirmation Award language misinterpreted to yield a larger judgment Court adopted findings of the award; no error in confirmation Judgment vacated and remanded for consistency with opinion

Key Cases Cited

  • Greene v. Hundley, 266 Ga. 592 (1996) (exclusive grounds for vacating arbitration awards)
  • ABCO Builders v. Progressive Plumbing, 282 Ga. 308 (2007) (review limited to five statutory grounds for vacating awards)
  • Blum v. Blum, 242 Ga. 718 (1978) (partiality and evidentiary standards for vacatur)
  • Torres v. Piedmont Builders, 300 Ga. App. 872 (2009) (same standard for partiality and review on appeal)
  • White v. SunTrust Bank, 245 Ga. App. 828 (2000) (disclosure obligations of arbitrators under Henning Rules)
  • Bell v. Forster, 211 Ga. App. 76 (1993) (duty to show error with competent record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Phan v. ANDRE & BLAUSTEIN, LLP
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 25, 2011
Citation: 309 Ga. App. 191
Docket Number: A10A2155
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.