History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 COA 137
Colo. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • RLND developed a private residential complex at Aspen Mountain with 8 hotel units, 8 affordable units, 3 commercial units, and 26 condominiums; 208 fractional interests were sold.
  • PFW acquired an eighth interest in a four-bedroom condominium unit via Miller, who assigned to PFW in May 2008.
  • Construction/closing were set for December 2008, but the market declined; PFW gave notice of rescission and demanded earnest money release.
  • PFW asserted ILSFDA violations, breach of contract, and fraudulent inducement; the parties pursued arbitration on nine non-ILSFDA claims.
  • Arbitrator ruled in RLND’s favor on the nine non-ILSFDA claims; PFW moved to vacate the arbitration award, which the court denied.
  • The trial court later granted judgment in RLND’s favor on the ILSFDA claims in July 2011; this appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the interests are 'lots' under ILSFDA PFW: interests are 'lots' under HUD guidance. RLND: interests are not 'lots' because no exclusive possession. PFW's ILSFDA claims fail; interests not 'lots' and exempt from registration.
Whether the arbitration award can be vacated for fraud PFW: award procured by RLND’s concealment of improper registration. RLND: issue belongs to arbitrator; proper basis to deny vacatur. Trial court’s denial of vacatur affirmed; fraud issue not properly before court.

Key Cases Cited

  • Giralt v. Vail Village Inn Associates, 759 P.2d 801 (Colo. App. 1988) (interpretation of documents and de novo statutory interpretation)
  • Winter v. Hollingsworth Properties, Inc., 777 F.2d 1444 (11th Cir. 1985) (HUD treatment of condos as lots with exclusivity concerns)
  • Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-Cattle, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. App. 2006) (read documents together; multiple documents in a single transaction)
  • Bodansky v. Fifth on Park Condo, LLC, 635 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 2011) (sale occurs when buyer signs purchase agreement; reliance on HUD guidance)
  • Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC. Apartments, 159 P.3d 116 (Colo. App. 2007) (fraud generally; arbitrability and contract validity vs. arbitration clause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: PFW, Inc. v. Residences at Little Nell Development, LLC
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 16, 2012
Citations: 2012 COA 137; 292 P.3d 1094; 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 2153; 2012 WL 3518019; No. 11CA1656
Docket Number: No. 11CA1656
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    PFW, Inc. v. Residences at Little Nell Development, LLC, 2012 COA 137