midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2023 Ohio 1140
Ohio Ct. App.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Alicia filed for divorce in October 2020 and moved to sell the marital residence on June 7, 2022; Rene opposed.
  • Trial court granted the predecree motion to sell on July 7, 2022 and ordered proceeds held in Alicia’s counsel’s IOLTA.
  • Rene filed a motion to vacate the sale order on July 14, 2022; the court denied the motion on July 19, 2022.
  • Rene appealed the July 19, 2022 judgment denying his motion to vacate (notice filed July 22, 2022) and challenged the underlying sale order.
  • The court addressed whether the appeal was from a final, appealable order and whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the sale; the court affirmed the sale order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Finality / Jurisdiction: whether the judgment denying the motion to vacate is a final, appealable order Alicia: denial is not a final appealable order; appeal should be from the sale order Rene: pretrial sale order is a final order (Malik); he timely appealed and the motion to vacate was a nullity Court exercised discretion to hear the appeal despite notice labeling; treated motion to vacate as nullity and found appellate jurisdiction appropriate
Merits: whether trial court abused its discretion in ordering sale of the marital home pretrial Alicia: sale equitable under R.C. 3105.171(J)(2); proceeds are escrowed and division can occur later Rene: sale should await trial; lack of valuation; wants to buy out Alicia; separate-property claim; sale costs would reduce equity No abuse of discretion: sale was appropriate to manage the docket, escrow protects rights, valuation/liens resolved by sale; judgment affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Lorain Edn. Assn. v. Lorain City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 46 Ohio St.3d 12, 544 N.E.2d 687 (Ohio 1989) (agency loses jurisdiction once appeal filed; explains limits on reconsideration/vacatur while appeal pending)
  • Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Nolan, 72 Ohio St.3d 320, 649 N.E.2d 1229 (Ohio 1995) (timely notice of appeal is the sole jurisdictional prerequisite; other defects are discretionary)
  • Pitts v. Dept. of Transp., 67 Ohio St.2d 378, 423 N.E.2d 1105 (Ohio 1981) (trial courts have no general procedure for motions for reconsideration after final judgment; such motions are nullities)
  • Johnson v. Abdullah, 166 Ohio St.3d 427, 187 N.E.3d 463 (Ohio 2021) (defines abuse-of-discretion standard for appellate review)
  • Gasper v. Bank of Am., N.A., 133 N.E.3d 1037 (Ohio 2019) (takes contrary view that an order granting a common-law motion to vacate can be a final, appealable order)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Perozeni v. Perozeni
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 6, 2023
Citations: 2023 Ohio 1140; 111771
Docket Number: 111771
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In