History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perillo v. Commissioner of Correction
2014 WL 1017969
Conn. App. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner pled guilty on Feb. 11, 2008 to first-degree manslaughter under Alford doctrine and to escape from custody; sentence: 30 years with 20 years suspended and 5 years probation.
  • Petitioner did not file a direct appeal but commenced a habeas action as a self-represented litigant.
  • Habeas petition filed Aug. 25, 2011 alleged ineffective assistance of habeas trial counsel Day and other deficiencies, plus due process claim about plea knowing, intelligent, voluntary.
  • Habeas court denied certification to appeal on Feb. 28–29, 2012; petitioner sought cert. to appeal the denial.
  • Appellate challenge on appeal concerns only habeas counsel’s conduct, not the underlying criminal trial counsel; Court reviews certification ruling for abuse of discretion.
  • Petitioner’s claims were not raised in the petition for certification to appeal; the court held review of unraised issues improper and dismissed the appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal Perillo argues trial counsel issues affect cert. State contends petition did not raise the underlying issues; discretionary denial appropriate. No; denial affirmed; abuse not shown.
Whether issues not raised in the petition for certification can be reviewed Perillo seeks review of claims not raised in the certification petition. Court cannot review unraised issues; would ambush habeas judge. Unraised claims cannot be reviewed; dismissal upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • Campbell v. Commissioner of Correction, 132 Conn. App. 263 (2011) (review limits when not raised in petition for certification to appeal)
  • Perry v. Commissioner of Correction, 131 Conn. App. 792 (2011) (claims not included in petition not reviewable)
  • Logan v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 744 (2010) (same principle)
  • Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1 (2002) (supports limited review of certification petitions)
  • Spyke v. Commissioner of Correction, 145 Conn. App. 419 (2013) (abuse of discretion standard for habeas matters)
  • Crespo v. Commissioner of Correction, 292 Conn. 804 (2009) (habeas review procedure guidance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Perillo v. Commissioner of Correction
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Mar 25, 2014
Citation: 2014 WL 1017969
Docket Number: AC34604
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.