85 N.E.3d 655
Ind. Ct. App.2017Background
- Southwest Dubois County School Corp. hired a construction manager under an AIA-based Construction Manager Contract that included a broad waiver of subrogation by the owner and construction manager "and against the Contractors" for losses covered by property insurance.
- Southwest later contracted with PSI to supply and install an HVAC system; the PSI contract contained an integration clause and no express subrogation waiver or incorporation of the Construction Manager Contract.
- PSI subcontracted piping and sheet-metal work to Huntingburg; the Huntingburg subcontract incorporated the PSI contract and contained a subrogation-waiver clause in favor of PSI and Southwest.
- Water from an uncapped pipe damaged school technology equipment in 2011; Hanover (Southwest’s insurer) paid $698,661.71 and received a release from Southwest when it settled the claim in 2012.
- Hanover, as subrogee, sued PSI and Huntingburg in 2014 seeking recovery; PSI and Huntingburg moved for summary judgment arguing Hanover’s subrogation claim was barred by the Construction Manager Contract waiver. The trial court denied summary judgment; the denial was certified for interlocutory appeal.
- The Court of Appeals held the Construction Manager Contract’s waiver of subrogation applied to bar Hanover’s subrogation claim and reversed to grant summary judgment for PSI and Huntingburg.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Hanover’s subrogation claim is barred by the Construction Manager Contract waiver of subrogation | Hanover: PSI contract is a separate, later agreement that does not incorporate the Construction Manager Contract, so no waiver applies | PSI/Huntingburg: The Construction Manager Contract waived subrogation "against the Contractors," and that waiver binds subsequent contractors and their insurers/subrogees | Waiver in the Construction Manager Contract applied; Hanover’s subrogation claim barred and summary judgment for PSI/Huntingburg required |
Key Cases Cited
- Jefferson County v. Teton Corp., 30 N.E.3d 711 (Ind. 2015) (AIA-style waiver bars subrogation against contractors for all damages covered by the owner’s property insurance)
- Best Friends Pet Care, Inc. v. Design Learned, Inc., 823 A.2d 329 (Conn. App. 2003) (owner–general-contractor waiver enforces against claims by insurer despite lack of identical waiver in subcontractor contract)
- Behr v. Hook, 787 A.2d 499 (Vt. 2001) (absence of mutual waivers with subcontractors does not defeat the primary purpose of the AIA subrogation waiver)
- South Tippecanoe Sch. Bldg. Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc., 395 N.E.2d 320 (Ind. Ct. App. 1979) (AIA insurance/allocation provisions show intent to place construction risk on insurers and permit enforcement of subrogation waivers)
