History
  • No items yet
midpage
284 P.3d 1280
Or. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner was charged with first-degree robbery under ORS 164.415(1).
  • The charge alleged use of a dangerous weapon to prevent or overcome resistance during theft in a store.
  • Trial evidence conflicted on whether petitioner pulled a gun inside or outside the store; one witness said the gun was pulled inside, another that it was shown then not used.
  • Petitioner testified he opened the backpack only after insistence by store personnel and claimed no intent to threaten anyone.
  • Trial court and post-conviction court discussed lesser-included offense third-degree robbery, with the post-conviction court concluding defense counsel failed to consider requesting that instruction.
  • Post-conviction relief was granted; court found trial counsel’s failure to request a third-degree robbery instruction prejudiced petitioner.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did trial counsel's failure to request third-degree robbery instruction constitute deficient performance? Petitioner argues counsel failed to consider a valid lesser-included offense. Armstrong argues a deliberate strategic choice could justify not requesting. Yes; record supports failure to consider, indicating deficient performance.
Was petitioner prejudiced by lack of third-degree instruction despite firearm finding? Prejudice shown because jury was not instructed on lesser offense and verdict could have differed. Jury found firearm use; prejudice purportedly not possible. Yes; absence of third-degree instruction prejudiced petitioner; relief awarded.

Key Cases Cited

  • Trotter v. Santos, 212 Or App 473 (Or. App. 2007) (inadequate assistance requires prejudice showing; lesser-included failure can be prejudicial)
  • State v. Moses, 165 Or App 317 (Or. App. 2000) (lack of complete statutory instruction complicates prejudice analysis)
  • State v. Leckenby, 200 Or App 684 (Or. App. 2005) (jury unaware of lesser offense may affect evaluation of greater offense)
  • Moroney, 289 Or 597 (Or. 1980) (third-degree robbery is a lesser-included offense of first-degree robbery)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pereida-Alba v. Coursey
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 29, 2012
Citations: 284 P.3d 1280; 2012 WL 3727307; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1057; 252 Or. App. 66; CV090464; A146174
Docket Number: CV090464; A146174
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    Pereida-Alba v. Coursey, 284 P.3d 1280