Perdum v. Forest City Ratner Companies
677 F. App'x 2
| 2d Cir. | 2017Background
- Plaintiff Jerome K. Perdum, Sr. sued Forest City Ratner Companies and related entities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), alleging disability discrimination arising from parking-related barriers and harassment at Atlantic Mall and a Pathmark store.
- Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that Perdum lacked standing to bring an ADA claim.
- The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, finding Perdum failed to show an Article III injury in fact, and entered judgment on March 29, 2016.
- Perdum appealed to the Second Circuit, which reviewed standing de novo and considered whether alleged harassment and lack of access to handicapped parking constituted a concrete and particularized injury.
- The record showed Perdum had returned to and shopped at the mall using alternative parking and that the mall garage provided designated handicapped spaces with direct elevator access; Perdum avoided the garage because of claustrophobia he did not allege as a disability.
- The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment, concluding Perdum lacked standing under the ADA.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standing / injury in fact under the ADA | Perdum argued harassment and penalties from parking enforcement deterred him from using the mall and thus constituted an injury (deterrence theory). | Defendants argued the alleged harassment posed no actual obstacle to access because Perdum continued to shop at the mall using alternative parking and thus suffered no concrete injury. | Court held no standing: deterrence claim contradicted undisputed evidence that Perdum returned to shop; harassment did not create an injury in fact. |
| Denial of access to handicapped parking | Perdum asserted he was denied access to handicapped parking and thus injured. | Defendants pointed to 30 designated handicapped spaces in the garage with direct elevator access; Perdum chose not to use the garage due to claustrophobia, not an alleged disability. | Court held no standing: accessible parking was available and Perdum’s avoidance was based on a condition he did not claim as a disability. |
Key Cases Cited
- Kreisler v. Second Ave. Diner Corp., 731 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2013) (deterrence from using a public accommodation can constitute injury under the ADA when supported by evidence)
- Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin., 710 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2013) (standard of review for standing on summary judgment; standing requires a concrete and particularized injury)
- Perdum v. Forest City Ratner Cos., 174 F. Supp. 3d 706 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) (district court opinion granting summary judgment for lack of standing; affirmed by the Second Circuit)
