Perdue v. State
298 Ga. 841
| Ga. | 2016Background
- On May 21, 2008, Shawn Perdue was left alone with his girlfriend’s two-month-old daughter, Kyliah Mack; the child was alive and playing when the mother left that morning.
- Perdue admitted holding and shaking the infant for several minutes without supporting her head after she would not stop crying; the baby later vomited, became unresponsive, and was found cool to the touch.
- Paramedics and hospital staff determined Kyliah was dead on arrival; autopsy showed blunt-force head trauma, retinal and brain hemorrhages, and a fresh buttock hemorrhage consistent with homicidal shaking.
- Perdue gave inconsistent statements about timing and events, at times saying the baby choked on milk and at other times that he left and returned to find her unresponsive.
- A jury convicted Perdue of malice murder; he was sentenced to life imprisonment. The felony-murder conviction was vacated by operation of law. Perdue’s amended motion for new trial was denied and he appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Perdue's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether evidence was sufficient for malice murder | Evidence was not sufficient; verdict contrary to evidence | Evidence (injuries, autopsy, conduct) supports conviction beyond a reasonable doubt | Court: Evidence sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia; conviction affirmed |
| Whether the trial court applied correct standard when denying new trial on general grounds (OCGA §§ 5-5-20, 5-5-21) | Trial court used Jackson sufficiency standard, failed to exercise discretion as the "thirteenth juror" | Trial court explicitly weighed evidence and exercised discretion; referenced bench observations | Court: No error — trial court exercised its discretion and properly denied new trial |
| Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not procuring expert witnesses due to cost | Counsel’s failure to call experts was deficient and prejudicial | Counsel made a strategic, reasonable decision after consulting potential experts and drew favorable testimony via cross-examination; no prejudice shown | Court: No Strickland violation — decision was reasonable strategy and defendant failed to show prejudice |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (legal standard for sufficiency of the evidence review)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- Walker v. State, 292 Ga. 262 (2013) (trial court must exercise discretion as thirteenth juror on general grounds motion for new trial)
- Brown v. State, 292 Ga. 454 (2013) (calls to trial strategy in expert-witness decisions)
- Gomillion v. State, 296 Ga. 678 (2015) (discussion of trial-court duties on new-trial motions)
- Torres v. State, 297 Ga. 32 (2015) (application of Strickland in Georgia)
- Gibson v. State, 290 Ga. 6 (2011) (role of cross-examination and expert evidence in shaken-baby cases)
