History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Walker
210 Cal. App. 4th 1372
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Walker, a Black male, was detained at a San Jose light-rail station by Deputy Thrall after Thrall suspected he resembled a sexual-battery suspect from the prior week.
  • Thrall asked for fare proof; Walker produced ID that belonged to someone else and was arrested after Thrall learned the ID was false.
  • A search incident to arrest yielded cocaine base and marijuana.
  • Walker pleaded guilty to counts on probation with imposition suspended; probation was later granted.
  • Walker moved to suppress under Penal Code 1538.5; the trial court denied the motion and the plea proceeded.
  • The appellate court held Thrall lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion to detain and reversed the probation order and remanded with directions to dismiss.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Thrall's detention supported by reasonable suspicion? People argued totality of circumstances showed suspicion. Walker argued detention was pretextual and based on race/appearance. No; detention invalid for lack of reasonable suspicion.
Could the detention be justified by fare-check authority? People relied on authority to stop fare evaders. Walker contends the stop was a pretext for investigating the sex crime. No; fare check justification cannot validate a pretextual stop.
Should evidence be suppressed due to unlawful detention and arrest? N/A N/A Yes; suppression required, leading to dismissal.
Did reliance on resemblance to suspects and station/area support suspicion? People relied on resemblance and location as factors. Walker contends resemblance was insufficient; station timing attenuated relevance. No; these factors did not establish objective reasonable suspicion.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Tony C., 21 Cal.3d 888 (Cal. 1978) (establishes totality-of-circumstances approach to detentions)
  • United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 (U.S. 1981) (reasonableness based on totality of circumstances)
  • People v. Souza, 9 Cal.4th 224 (Cal. 1994) (defines reasonable-suspicion standard and its limits)
  • Williams v. Superior Court, 168 Cal.App.3d 349 (Cal. App. 1985) (photos/descriptions not sufficient for suspicion; concerns about racial profiling)
  • Durazo, 124 Cal.App.4th 728 (Cal. App. 2004) (attenuation of prior-crime nexus in detention analysis)
  • People v. Bower, 24 Cal.3d 638 (Cal. 1979) (limits on using race to justify detention; pre-proposition 8 context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Walker
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 18, 2012
Citation: 210 Cal. App. 4th 1372
Docket Number: No. H037287
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.