History
  • No items yet
midpage
846 N.W.2d 412
Mich. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • January 30, 2011: defendant allegedly took a rifle into his estranged wife Michelle Szabo's home; Michael was present and shot in the arm; Szabo was not shot.
  • Police investigated; two walls had bullet holes; defendant initially charged with felonious assault and felony-firearm regarding Michael and assault against Szabo.
  • Preliminary examination in district court (Feb 14, 2012); spousal privilege issue raised; Szabo testified; Michael’s felonious charges dismissed without prejudice.
  • Defendant moved to quash/dismiss, arguing Szabo was compelled to testify despite privilege; Szabo's affidavit indicated she invoked no fear and did not want to testify.
  • Circuit court granted the motion, finding Szabo could not be compelled to testify; prosecution appealed.
  • Court reverses and remands for reinstatement of charges, holding that MCL 600.2162(3)(d) does not allow compelling Szabo to testify against defendant; spousal privilege does not apply here.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does MCL 600.2162(3)(d) bar spousal privilege here? People argues the personal wrong exception negates privilege. Szabo argues privilege barred testimony. Privilege does not apply; testimony may be compelled; charges reinstated.
Who may testify when 3(d) applies? People contends no privilege in this scenario; witness-spouse not protected. Szabo asserts exception transfers control of privilege? Victim/witness spouse not required to testify; statute reading controls; no transfer of privilege.
Is de novo review proper for statutory interpretation here? People relies on statutory language to defeat privilege. Szabo argues legislative intent supports privilege. Court conducts de novo review of statutory interpretation.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v Love, 425 Mich 691 (1986) (personal-wrong exception to spousal privilege; whether compelled testimony allowed varies by context; plurality discussions)
  • People v Sykes, 117 Mich App 117 (1982) (permits testimony when exception applies; victim-spouse may testify or privilege applied)
  • People v Ellis, 174 Mich App 139 (1988) (previous spousal privilege framework; compelled testimony in certain cases)
  • People v Warren, 462 Mich 415 (2000) (amended statute; scope of personal-wrong exception in third-party crimes)
  • People v Cole, 491 Mich 325 (2012) (statutory construction; enforce plain language of MCL 600.2162)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Szabo
Court Name: Michigan Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 3, 2014
Citations: 846 N.W.2d 412; 303 Mich. App. 737; Docket No. 311274
Docket Number: Docket No. 311274
Court Abbreviation: Mich. Ct. App.
Log In