History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Smulik
2012 IL App (2d) 110110
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Smulik dined, then drove to a bar and to a gas station after a dispute, parking in a marked space with engine off.
  • A police car activated emergency lights behind Smulik at the gas station; Smulik did not drive away.
  • Officer Johnson received an anonymous tip via dispatcher that Smulik had been drinking at Redstone and was driving while drunk.
  • Dispatcher relayed the vehicle description, license plate, and location; a vehicle matching the description was found at the gas station with Smulik inside.
  • Johnson detected bloodshot eyes and the odor of alcohol; Smulik admitted to drinking wine and vodka earlier.
  • The trial court granted Smulik’s motion to quash the arrest and suppress evidence; the appellate court affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. Smulik Smulik No; stop lacked sufficient reliability and corroboration.
Whether an anonymous tip can justify a Terry stop given corroboration requirements. Plt Smulik Insufficient corroboration; anonymous tip not predictive.
Whether corroboration of noninculpatory details suffices when tip is anonymous. Plt Smulik Not enough to meet reliability standard under White and J.L.
Whether urgency of potential drunk driving changes the evidentiary burden. Plt Smulik No; urgency did not convert tip into reliable basis for stop.

Key Cases Cited

  • Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (U.S. Supreme Court 2000) (anonymous tip lacking predictive information fails to justify stop)
  • Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (U.S. Supreme Court 1990) (corroboration of significant aspects may justify stops in close cases)
  • City of Highland Park v. Lee, 291 Ill. App. 3d 48 (2d Dist. 1997) (emergency lights behind a vehicle limit freedom to decline encounter)
  • People v. Linley, 388 Ill. App. 3d 747 (2d Dist. 2009) (informant tips require reliability assessment and corroboration in Terry stops)
  • People v. Shafer, 372 Ill. App. 3d 1044 (2d Dist. 2007) (drunk-driver tips may relax corroboration requirements in some analyses)
  • People v. Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d 530 (Supreme Court of Illinois 2006) (consent-based tolerances and testing considerations in stops)
  • State v. Rutzinski, 623 N.W.2d 516 (Wis. 2001) (contemporaneous reporting may inform knowledge bearing on reliability)
  • People v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (U.S. Supreme Court 1990) (anonymous tips require predictive information and corroboration for reliability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Smulik
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jan 6, 2012
Citation: 2012 IL App (2d) 110110
Docket Number: 2-11-0110
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.