History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 IL App (2d) 100764
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Slavin was charged with possession of cannabis and drug paraphernalia after police entered an ice fishing shanty without a warrant.
  • Officer Fehrenbacher patrolled Spring Lake for fishing violations and overheard occupants discussing cannabis-related activity inside the shanty.
  • The officer observed cannabis odor inside and recovered cannabis and a pipe from Slavin during an ensuing search of the shanty.
  • Trial court denied the suppression motion, ruling the shanty resembled an automobile and applying an automobile exception to warrantless entry.
  • Defendant was convicted after a bench trial and sentenced to conditional discharge and a fine.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether warrantless entry/search complied with the Fourth Amendment Slavin argues shanty is a dwelling; warrant required. State argues shanty is like an automobile; exigent circumstances justified entry. Entry/search upheld; exigent-circumstances and probable cause supported.
Whether defendant had a reasonable privacy interest in the ice shanty Slavin had dwelling-like privacy under Fourth Amendment. Shanty is mobile and not a dwelling; no expectation of privacy. Shanty not a dwelling; no reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless entry permissible under totality of circumstances.
Whether the record preserves the suppression ruling despite forfeiture concerns Court reviews de novo; may affirm on any record bases; forfeiture not required.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Stroud, 392 Ill.App.3d 776 (2009) (automobile-exception rationale in context of a vehicle-like structure)
  • Redwood v. Lierman, 331 Ill. App. 3d 1073 (2002) (exigent circumstances and privacy expectations in mobile structures)
  • California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985) (vehicle mobility supports warrantless entry under automobile exception)
  • Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) (home-entry privacy protections; core privacy expectations)
  • Ouellette, 78 Ill.2d 511 (1979) (particulars of exigent circumstances and warrantless entry standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Slavin
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 30, 2011
Citations: 2011 IL App (2d) 100764; 964 N.E.2d 150; 357 Ill. Dec. 787; 2-10-0764
Docket Number: 2-10-0764
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    People v. Slavin, 2011 IL App (2d) 100764