History
  • No items yet
midpage
203 Cal. App. 4th 839
Cal. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Tyrone Sanders appealed a two-year SVP commitment entered via stipulation after admission to petition allegations.
  • Prior to 2006, SVP commitments were two-year terms; 2006 amendments and Jessica’s Law created indeterminate terms.
  • Stipulation on October 31, 2006 stated two-year term would apply in pending cases after the effective date, despite the later law.
  • Defense sought continuances; multiple Marsden motions; delay in trial proceedings was ongoing.
  • May 11, 2010 stipulation admitted petition allegations and set two-year term; preserved potential appeal regarding speedy-trial issues,

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether admission forecloses delay-based due process appeal Sanders argues delay violated due process State contends delay issue was not preserved by admission Admission forecloses review of delay-based due process
Validity of the two-year stipulation given Castillo’s later ruling Stipulation premised on future Castillo decisions Stipulation valid at time of agreement; Castillo would not retroactively void it Stipulation not invalid for lack of consideration; enforceable
Whether the stipulation was improperly induced regarding appeal rights Agreement conditioned on preserving speed-trial appeal No promise about appeal rights; not a condition Record shows no improper inducement; waiver valid

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. DeVaughn, 18 Cal.3d 889 (Cal. Supreme Court 1977) (guilty plea effects on speedy-trial review)
  • Castillo, 49 Cal.4th 145 (Cal. Supreme Court 2010) (two-year SVP stipulations invalid post-Castillo decision)
  • Litmon v. Superior Court, 123 Cal.App.4th 1156 (Cal. App. 4th 2004) (due process in SVP proceedings and timing of hearings)
  • People v. Medina, 171 Cal.App.4th 805 (Cal. App. 4th 2009) (consent judgment not appealable when based on contract)
  • Cooley v. Superior Court, 29 Cal.4th 228 (Cal. 2002) (SVP framework and due process protections)
  • People v. Kaanehe, 19 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. Supreme Court 1977) (limitations on expanding appellate jurisdiction via stipulations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sanders
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 21, 2012
Citations: 203 Cal. App. 4th 839; 137 Cal. Rptr. 3d 830; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 153; 2012 WL 540583; No. B225024
Docket Number: No. B225024
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In