History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Richard
2012 IL App (5th) 100302
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant charged with one count of first-degree murder (Dec. 29, 2004).
  • Defendant pled guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea; State capped sentence at 55 years.
  • Post-plea Rule 604(d) certification issue arose after remand for compliance.
  • Defense filed multiple amended postplea motions and certificates (third amended cert. 2010).
  • Evidentiary hearing conducted June 3, 2010 on the third amended motion; court denied withdrawal and stated no authority to reconsider sentence.
  • This appeal challenges Rule 604(d) certification sufficiency and circuit court authority to reconsider a negotiated-cap sentence without withdrawing the plea; court remands for proper certification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Rule 604(d) certificate is sufficient. People argues certification meets Rule 604(d) standards. Richard contends certificate fails to show defendant’s nonconstitutional contentions and proper record review. Certificate deficient; remand for fresh compliance.
Whether circuit court could reconsider a negotiated sentence without withdrawal. People argues not applicable; court can review if proper postplea motion. Richard argues court has authority to reconsider despite not withdrawing plea. Court cannot reconsider a negotiated sentence without withdrawal; need remand for proper procedure.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Grice, 371 Ill. App. 3d 813 (2007) (strict Rule 604(d) compliance required; not inferable from record)
  • People v. Prather, 379 Ill. App. 3d 763 (2008) (certificate may omit wording but must show proper ascertainment of errors)
  • People v. Dismuke, 355 Ill. App. 3d 606 (2005) (need explicit demonstration of duties under Rule 604(d))
  • People v. Janes, 158 Ill. 2d 27 (1994) (strictly comply with Rule 604(d))
  • People v. Evans, 174 Ill. 2d 320 (1996) (negotiated plea limits on post-plea relief; motion to reconsider requires withdrawal)
  • People v. Linder, 186 Ill. 2d 67 (1999) (cap on sentence; must withdraw plea to challenge sentence)
  • People v. Haley, 315 Ill. App. 3d 717 (2000) (require withdrawal to challenge sentence under negotiated plea)
  • Starks v. State, 344 Ill. App. 3d 766 (2003) (context for Rule 604(d) duties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Richard
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jun 7, 2012
Citation: 2012 IL App (5th) 100302
Docket Number: 5-10-0302
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.