History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Mitchell
209 Cal. App. 4th 1364
Cal. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Kenyatta Mitchell was convicted of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger under former Penal Code § 12020(a)(4).
  • Mitchell testified he carried the knife for fishing and self-defense and claimed it was not concealed.
  • A 11-inch knife with a 5-inch blade was found concealed on Mitchell after he leaned forward at a trolley station.
  • Mitchell elected to represent himself at trial; the jury verdict followed by admissions to prior prison term and strike allegations.
  • Mitchell was sentenced to five years: four years for the offense and one year for a prior prison term.
  • Mitchell challenged the statute’s constitutionality and asked for an instruction on intent to conceal; appellate review followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constitutionality of the concealment ban Mitchell contends the statute violates the Second Amendment per Heller. Mitchell argues the ban is unconstitutional facially and as applied to him. Statute upheld; intermediate scrutiny applied and deemed constitutional.
Necessity of a specific intent to conceal instruction Mitchell claims the jury should have been instructed on intent to conceal as an element. Mitchell asserts lack of instruction on specific concealment intent was error. No sua sponte instructional error; intent to conceal not a separate element beyond general intent.

Key Cases Cited

  • Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (U.S. 2008) (recognizes right to bear arms with limits; supports partial restrictions on bearing weapons)
  • People v. Rubalcava, 23 Cal.4th 322 (Cal. 2000) (knowledge element in concealed-weapon offense; no specific concealment intent required)
  • In re Luke W., 88 Cal.App.4th 650 (Cal. App. 2001) (concerning exceptions for knives carried openly or non-switchblade folding knives)
  • In re George W., 68 Cal.App.4th 1208 (Cal. App. 1998) (knife classifications and concealment concepts under § 12020)
  • People v. Yarbrough, 169 Cal.App.4th 303 (Cal. App. 2008) (concealed-carry statutes with Heller context; public-safety rationale)
  • People v. Ellison, 196 Cal.App.4th 1342 (Cal. App. 2011) (intermediate scrutiny and permitted limitations on weapon carry post-Heller)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Mitchell
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 11, 2012
Citation: 209 Cal. App. 4th 1364
Docket Number: No. D059254
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.