History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. McGowan
242 Cal. App. 4th 377
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Douglas McGowan, arrested while under the Santa Monica Pier, was charged in a misdemeanor complaint with camping in a prohibited place, possession of a milk crate, and loitering.
  • McGowan moved under Penal Code § 991 for an in-custody probable-cause determination; the trial court dismissed two counts and retained one (possession of a milk crate).
  • The Appellate Division reversed, holding § 991 permits dismissal only of the entire complaint, not individual counts.
  • The California Supreme Court granted transfer to resolve whether § 991 authorizes count-by-count dismissals or only all-or-nothing dismissal.
  • Although moot as to McGowan’s custody, the Court proceeded because the issue has broader public importance for pretrial misdemeanor practice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (People) Defendant's Argument (McGowan) Held
Does Penal Code § 991 allow dismissal of individual counts within a misdemeanor complaint, or only dismissal of the entire complaint? § 991’s plain text refers to "the complaint," so it authorizes dismissal only of the entire complaint. § 991 should be read like § 995 and § 1385: dismissal of the whole implies power to dismiss part; § 991’s purpose is to weed out unsupported charges, so courts may dismiss individual counts. The Court held § 991 permits dismissal of individual counts from a misdemeanor complaint.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1975) (Fourth Amendment requires a timely judicial probable-cause determination for pretrial detention)
  • In re Walters, 15 Cal.3d 738 (Cal. 1975) (California requirement that detained misdemeanants are entitled to a judicial probable-cause determination)
  • People v. Burke, 47 Cal.2d 45 (Cal. 1956) (authority to dismiss an entire action includes power to dismiss part)
  • People v. Superior Court (Mendella), 33 Cal.3d 754 (Cal. 1983) (§ 995 challenges may target portions of an indictment or information)
  • People v. Carter, 36 Cal.4th 1215 (Cal. 2005) (§ 654 does not bar later trial on charges dismissed from an earlier complaint)
  • Kellett v. Superior Court, 63 Cal.2d 822 (Cal. 1966) (multiple-prosecution rule addressing related offenses; limits on successive prosecutions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. McGowan
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 19, 2015
Citation: 242 Cal. App. 4th 377
Docket Number: B263026
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.