History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. M.A.
209 Cal. App. 4th 317
Cal. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • M.A. entered a house with the occupant's permission without felonious intent.
  • Inside, M.A. learned guns were present and opened a front-entryway closet to steal them.
  • Guns were stored in an open safe within the closet in the entryway closet.
  • The juvenile court found true on counts of first degree burglary and grand theft of a firearm.
  • M.A. was adjudged a ward and committed to the Breaking Cycles program for up to 150 days.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is entering a closet inside a residence a room under 459? M.A. argues no room entry occurred. People argues closet fits room concept under Sparks guidance. closet is a room for burglary purposes.
Can entry into the closet support first degree burglary of an inhabited dwelling? M.A. contends the closet alone is not an inhabited dwelling. People contends closet is functionally interconnected to dwelling. Yes; entry into the closet supports first degree burglary of an inhabited dwelling.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Sparks, 28 Cal.4th 71 (Cal. 2002) (defines room in burglary; supports treating closet as room)
  • People v. Garcia, 214 Cal.App.2d 681 (Cal. App. Dist. 2, 1963) (storage room/ cage as room for burglary)
  • People v. Gaytan, 38 Cal.App.2d 83 (Cal. App. Dist. 2, 1940) (storage room burglary under section 459)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. M.A.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 13, 2012
Citation: 209 Cal. App. 4th 317
Docket Number: No. D060768
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.