History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Kazenko
972 N.E.2d 815
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Aaron S. Kazenko was charged with DUI(a)(5) by uniform traffic ticket on Dec 19, 2010; he demanded speedy trial on Dec 20, 2010 and the period was tolled by continuances and agreement, with a trial date of Jun 3, 2011; on Jun 2, 2011 the State sought leave to amend to add DUI(a)(2) and the court allowed over defense objection; the trial court granted the DUI(a)(2) dismissal on speedy-trial grounds; the State appealed to challenge that ruling; the appellate court concluded compulsory-joinder did not apply and the speedy-trial period did not toll the second charge, reversing and remanding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether compulsory-joinder applies to the two DUI charges. State contends compulsory-joinder does not apply due to uniform citation. Defendant contends either the rule applies or delays were attributable to defendant; the rule should toll the second charge. Compulsory-joinder does not apply; no tolling for the second charge.
Whether uniform citation defeats the applicability of compulsory joinder. State argues uniform citation bars applicability of compulsory joinder. Defendant argues forfeiture and that the rule may apply if appropriate. Uniform citation excludes compulsory-joinder in this context.
If no joinder, whether speedy-trial time on the original charge tolls the second charge. Delays on initial DUI(a)(5) could toll the overall period if joinder applied. Delays attributable to the defendant on initial charge should not toll the second charge when not joined. No tolling of the second charge’s speedy-trial period.
What is the proper standard of review for the trial court’s dismissal ruling? De novo review where facts are undisputed and the question is one of law.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Jackson, 118 Ill. 2d 179 (1987) (uniform citation does not trigger compulsory-joinder for certain offenses)
  • People v. Quigley, 183 Ill. 2d 1 (1998) (compulsory-joinder applies to charges known at start of prosecution)
  • People v. Phipps, 238 Ill. 2d 54 (2010) (Williams rule applied when same facts; delays before subsequent charge not attributed to defendant)
  • People v. Williams, 94 Ill. 2d 241 (1981) (continuances not attributable to defendant in certain timelines)
  • People v. Hall, 194 Ill. 2d 305 (2000) (speedy-trial tolling when delay is defendant-caused)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Kazenko
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jul 2, 2012
Citation: 972 N.E.2d 815
Docket Number: 3-11-0529
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.