People v. Jones
210 Cal. App. 4th 355
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2012Background
- Defendant Frank Theodore Jones appeals his conviction for possession of rock cocaine for sale and active participation in a criminal street gang, with multiple enhancements.
- A confidential informant linked a GSM/1200 Blocc Crips member known as 'Devil' to selling rock cocaine from 2259 12th Street; police surveilled the location.
- January 27, 2009: Jones and his girlfriend Milo exited the house; a traffic stop occurred; Jones claimed the house was not his paroled residence and asked about his dogs.
- During the search, officers found drugs and related paraphernalia including 0.6 g rock cocaine in a child’s jacket, a pay/owe sheet, wallet, cash, more cocaine and a scale; Milo was found with 0.8 g cocaine in her vagina.
- Detective Townsend testified Jones was an active GSM member; Jones had prior 1999 GSM sale conviction, admitted gang membership, and displayed tattoos linking to the gang.
- The jury convicted Jones of 11351.5 and 186.22(a); enhancements for prior felonies and strikes were found true; sentence was 25 years to life.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Marsden hearing was properly conducted | Jones argues the court failed to hold a Marsden hearing on his request to fire counsel. | Jones asserts the court's denial violated his rights and impeded his defense. | No error; abandonment of the Marsden motion. |
| Sufficiency of evidence to prove active gang participation | State contends evidence supports active gang membership and participation. | Jones argues the evidence does not prove active gang participation beyond mere association. | Evidence is sufficient to sustain active gang participation. |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Braxton, 34 Cal.4th 798 (Cal.4th 2004) (forfeitability of Marsden-related issues due to abandonment or acquiescence)
- People v. Vera, 122 Cal.App.4th 970 (Cal.App.4th 2004) (abandonment concept where defendant did not renew motion)
- People v. Marsden, 2 Cal.3d 118 (Cal. 1970) (establishes Marsden hearing framework)
