History
  • No items yet
midpage
2022 IL App (1st) 191101-B
Ill. App. Ct.
2022
Read the full case

Background:

  • In 2011 Griffin pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree murder and was sentenced to 35 years; the plea rested on witness statements/grand-jury testimony and a police-recorded confession.
  • Griffin later asserted his confession was coerced and did not file a timely motion to withdraw the plea; he pursued postconviction relief pro se and via counsel.
  • In 2019 Griffin sought leave to file a successive postconviction petition alleging (a) actual innocence based on two new affidavits (Lavonte Moore and Perrier Myles) identifying Jerrell Butler as the shooter and alleging witnesses lied, and (b) ineffective assistance for counsel’s failure to investigate Butler.
  • The circuit court denied leave, ruling a defendant who pleaded guilty cannot pursue an actual-innocence claim and noting no allegation of coercion of the plea; it did not address the ineffective-assistance claim.
  • The appellate court held that (1) Reed permits guilty-plea defendants to raise freestanding actual-innocence claims and (2) applying the Robinson leave-to-file standard the Moore and Myles affidavits set forth a colorable actual-innocence claim; the court reversed and remanded the entire petition for further proceedings.

Issues:

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a valid guilty plea bars a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act Guilty plea forecloses actual-innocence claims (cited Simmons) A guilty plea does not bar an actual-innocence claim (relying on Reed) Guilty plea does not bar such claims; Reed governs and Griffin may pursue actual innocence
Whether Moore and Myles affidavits satisfy the leave-to-file standard for actual innocence Affidavits are insufficient to show it is more likely than not no reasonable juror would convict Affidavits are newly discovered, material, noncumulative and raise probability no reasonable juror would convict Under Robinson leave-to-file standard, affidavits are colorable and warrant remand for further proceedings
Whether Griffin’s actual-innocence claim is barred because the same evidence also supports an ineffective-assistance claim (Hobley rule) The claims are not freestanding if they rely on overlapping evidence The two claims rest on different documentary bases; they need not be mutually exclusive Court found the actual-innocence claim rested on different evidence than the IAC claim, so Hobley did not bar it
What standard applies at the leave-to-file stage for a guilty-plea petitioner: Robinson or Reed? Reed’s clear-and-convincing formulation should apply earlier Robinson’s higher-leave-to-file standard applies at the leave stage; Reed’s clear-and-convincing standard applies at a later evidentiary stage Applied Robinson for leave-to-file; Reed’s clear-and-convincing reliability standard remains applicable at third-stage evidentiary hearings

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Washington, 171 Ill. 2d 475 (Ill. 1996) (recognized freestanding actual-innocence claims under Illinois law)
  • People v. Hobley, 182 Ill. 2d 404 (Ill. 1998) (held newly discovered evidence cannot serve simultaneously to support a freestanding innocence claim and an asserted trial-error claim in the same petition)
  • People v. Orange, 195 Ill. 2d 437 (Ill. 2001) (reiterated Hobley limitation on overlapping evidentiary use)
  • People v. Reed, 2020 IL 124940 (Ill. 2020) (held guilty plea does not bar actual-innocence claim; articulated clear-and-convincing standard for ultimate relief)
  • People v. Robinson, 2020 IL 123849 (Ill. 2020) (set the leave-to-file standard for successive postconviction actual-innocence claims)
  • People v. Coleman, 2013 IL 113307 (Ill. 2013) (distinguished standards for actual-innocence claims and trial-error claims in successive petitions)
  • People v. Sanders, 2016 IL 118123 (Ill. 2016) (procedural standards for evaluating postconviction pleadings)
  • Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551 (U.S. 1987) (governs counsel-withdrawal practice on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Griffin
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Mar 31, 2022
Citations: 2022 IL App (1st) 191101-B; 1-19-1101
Docket Number: 1-19-1101
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    People v. Griffin, 2022 IL App (1st) 191101-B