History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Giraud
354 Ill. Dec. 187
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Ernesto Giraud was convicted after a jury trial of one count aggravated criminal sexual assault, two counts criminal sexual assault, and one count criminal transmission of HIV; sentences run concurrently.
  • Victim T.G. was 16 at trial and lived with defendant, who was HIV positive and on treatment.
  • Defendant allegedly forced T.G. to have sex on multiple occasions between Thanksgiving 2007 and January 2008, with threats of harm to family if she disclosed.
  • The first assault involved unprotected intercourse; T.G. resisted, escaped to the bathroom, and defendant allegedly threatened further harm if she told anyone.
  • T.G. ingested Tylenol to the point of hospitalization about two weeks later; defendant acknowledged sexual encounters in statements to police.
  • Defendant testified to medical conditions and claimed he did not tell the truth in statements; the State’s evidence included these admissions and the alleged lack of consistent medical corroboration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether HIV exposure satisfies the ‘threaten or endanger life’ element State argues exposure could endanger life contemporaneously or in future Giraud contends exposure does not threaten life during the assault Not proven; only exposure to HIV without immediate threat does not meet the statute
Whether prosecutor's rebuttal comments shifted burden of proof State contends comments response to defense; did not shift burden Claims comments implied defendant had to prove credibility with doctors No reversible error; comments viewed in context and did not shift burden
Consecutive vs concurrent sentencing for HIV transmission N/A N/A HIV transmission sentence must run consecutively to sexual assault sentences; remand for resentencing

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Ramsey, 147 Ill.App.3d 1084 (1986) (threats to kill victim during assault when weapon involved can support 12-14(a)(3))
  • People v. Zernel, 259 Ill.App.3d 949 (1994) (threats to kill with weapon or display of gun justify 12-14(a)(3))
  • People v. McCoy, 207 Ill.2d 352 (2003) (pillow over face upheld life-threatend during assault)
  • People v. Everhart, 405 Ill.App.3d 687 (2010) (object to head and threat of killing during assault supports 12-14(a)(3))
  • People v. Singleton, 217 Ill.App.3d 675 (1991) (one-act, one-crime considerations; life-threats must occur during offense)
  • People v. Potts, 224 Ill.App.3d 938 (1992) (aggravation must be contemporaneous with assault under 12-14(a)(3))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Giraud
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Aug 30, 2011
Citation: 354 Ill. Dec. 187
Docket Number: 1-09-1261
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.