History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Frankel CA3
C080650
| Cal. Ct. App. | Oct 4, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • In Aug. 2015 Shane Frankel threatened and violently assaulted his girlfriend, Lindsay Dunlap, strangling her until she lost consciousness; Dunlap described him as possessive.
  • Police were called; Frankel denied the assault. He was charged with injuring a cohabitant (with a great-bodily-injury enhancement) and making criminal threats; he pleaded guilty to making criminal threats (§ 422).
  • Pursuant to a plea agreement, the other count and enhancement were dismissed. The court suspended sentence and granted 36 months’ probation with 180 days jail.
  • Probation included a protective order prohibiting any contact with Dunlap and a condition requiring Frankel to make all data devices and network accounts available for inspection (including passwords); officers may search on request.
  • Frankel objected at sentencing and appealed, arguing the electronic search condition was overbroad and unreasonable under People v. Lent. The Court of Appeal affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Validity of electronic search probation condition Condition is reasonably related to preventing future criminality and enforcing the protective order Condition is overbroad, unrelated to the convicted offense, and not reasonably related to future criminality (invokes Lent) Affirmed: condition reasonable and within trial court’s discretion to monitor compliance with no-contact order

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Lent, 15 Cal.3d 481 (1975) (three-part test for invalidating probation conditions)
  • People v. Olguin, 45 Cal.4th 375 (2008) (Lent analysis and relation to future criminality)
  • People v. Welch, 5 Cal.4th 228 (1993) (trial court abuse of discretion standard)
  • People v. Ebertowski, 228 Cal.App.4th 1170 (2014) (upholding similar electronic-search condition to monitor probationer’s activities)
  • People v. Harvey, 25 Cal.3d 754 (1979) (procedural waiver rule referenced for dismissal of other counts)
  • In re Ricardo P., 241 Cal.App.4th 676 (2015) (related appellate discussion of electronic searches; review granted)
  • In re Patrick F., 242 Cal.App.4th 104 (2015) (related appellate discussion; review granted)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Frankel CA3
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: C080650
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.