People v. Fletcher
2017 IL App (3d) 140530
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2017Background
- Defendant Alexander Fletcher was indicted for armed robbery with a firearm (accountability theory) based on a July 2, 2011 ATM robbery; victim Jacob McNamara testified a black man pointed a black revolver at him and took money and items.
- Investigators recovered a .38 revolver from a silver SUV on July 5, 2011; defendant admitted involvement in a separate July 5 attempted robbery and in a conversation admitted he and Aaron Anderson robbed someone on July 2, 2011, but did not admit a firearm was used on July 2.
- No written jury-waiver form or on-the-record colloquy appears in the record for the instant case; defense counsel, in a separate proceeding, stated “It is also bench, Judge. We waived.”
- At a bench trial the court admitted DVDs of defendant’s police interviews and found defendant guilty of armed robbery with a firearm; defendant was sentenced to 6 years plus a mandatory 15-year firearm enhancement (21 years total).
- On appeal the State conceded the record did not show a valid jury waiver; the appellate majority accepted that concession, vacated the conviction, and remanded for a new trial.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether defendant validly waived the right to a jury trial | Waiver occurred (conceded on appeal) or counsel’s statement sufficed | No written waiver or on-the-record waiver in open court; counsel’s statement insufficient | Majority: waiver not shown; conviction vacated and remanded (State conceded) |
| Sufficiency of the evidence that a firearm was used during the July 2 robbery | Victim unequivocally testified a revolver was pointed at him; circumstantial evidence (recovered gun days later, admissions) supports armed-robbery element | Evidence insufficient to prove presence of an actual firearm beyond a reasonable doubt; single uncorroborated eyewitness and no gun shown to victim | Majority: evidence sufficient to support armed-robbery conviction (no double jeopardy bar to retrial); dissent would reduce to robbery and remand for resentencing |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Tooles, 177 Ill. 2d 462 (1997) (written waiver not required if waiver made understandingly in open court; validity depends on circumstances)
- In re R.A.B., 197 Ill. 2d 358 (2001) (defense counsel may waive jury in defendant’s presence if defendant does not object)
- People v. Fiala, 85 Ill. App. 3d 397 (1980) (post‑robbery possession of a firearm may be insufficient to prove possession at time of robbery)
- People v. Toy, 407 Ill. App. 3d 272 (2011) (victim’s tactile contact with object pressed to head can support a finding that object was a firearm)
