History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Durant
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 103
Cal. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Durant, a felon on probation with search conditions, was stopped at night for failing to signal a left turn.
  • The first stop occurred near Bayshore Blvd; probation status was known to officers but Durant was not detained.
  • The following night, Durant (driving the same Pontiac) turned left without signaling; a traffic stop was initiated.
  • Officer Taylor pulled Durant over for failing to signal; Durant denied illegal activity and consented to searches.
  • A loaded handgun was found during a patdown; suppression motion denied; probation search condition invoked to justify search.
  • Court applied attenuation framework (Brendlin) to assess taint, concluding taint was dissipated by probation condition and recognition of probation status.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the stop violated Fourth Amendment Durant People Stop supported by reasonable suspicion of violation
Whether probation search condition justified the patdown Durant People Probation condition independent of stop; search valid
Whether knowledge of probation status was required at stop Durant People Advance knowledge not required for attenuation; search valid

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Carmona, 195 Cal.App.4th 1385 (Cal. App. Dist. 2nd) (read together §§22107–22108; objective requirement for signaling)
  • People v. Logsdon, 164 Cal.App.4th 741 (Cal. App. Dist. 2nd) (signal requirement and objective manifest doubt)
  • People v. White, 107 Cal.App.4th 636 (Cal. App. Dist. 4th) (mistake of law cannot justify stop)
  • People v. Hoeninghaus, 120 Cal.App.4th 1180 (Cal. App. Dist. 4th) (advance knowledge of probation condition required)
  • In re Jaime P., 40 Cal.4th 128 (Cal. 2006) (juvenile probationary search term knowledge required)
  • People v. Sanders, 31 Cal.4th 318 (Cal. 2003) (limits on reliance on parole/search conditions)
  • Brendlin v. California, 45 Cal.4th 262 (Cal. 2007) (attenuation factors; taint dissipated by intervening circumstances)
  • People v. Medina, 158 Cal.App.4th 1571 (Cal. App. Dist. 4th) (consent to warrantless searches as probation condition)
  • Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1963) (fruits of illegality doctrine; attenuation analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Durant
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 19, 2012
Citation: 140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 103
Docket Number: No. A131004
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.