History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Brown
79 N.E.3d 735
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Dieuseul Brown was tried for the 2013 shooting death of Kelsey Coleman; charged in two alternative counts of first-degree murder (felony murder and knowing conduct creating a strong probability of death).
  • Witnesses (McNulty and Richardson) identified Brown as an armed intruder who demanded money; they heard gunshots and saw Coleman after he was shot.
  • Brown testified he entered to buy drugs, an altercation ensued, Coleman attacked him, his gun fell out, he fired a warning shot and then shot Coleman in the back while believing deadly force was necessary.
  • Jury instructions included first-degree (Type A and B), second-degree murder, and that second-degree is a mitigated offense requiring defendant proof by preponderance after a first-degree finding.
  • Jury signed multiple, inconsistent verdict forms: acquitted Brown of first-degree murder (Type A), found him guilty of second-degree murder, acquitted on Type B (felony) but found he personally discharged a firearm; trial court entered the inconsistent verdicts and sentenced Brown to 24 years.
  • Brown appealed arguing the second-degree conviction must be vacated because acquittal of first-degree murder precludes conviction of second-degree (a mitigated form of first-degree); the State raised forfeiture and plain-error arguments.

Issues

Issue State's Argument Brown's Argument Held
Whether Brown forfeited appellate review of jury-verdict inconsistency Brown failed to object or raise in posttrial motion; forfeited unless plain error applies He raises a reasonable-doubt insufficiency argument that can be raised on appeal Forfeiture applies; court reviewed for plain error and proceeded under plain-error second-prong (substantial right)
Whether an acquittal of first-degree murder bars a conviction of second-degree murder (mitigated lesser) Jury erred in filling forms; Powell rationale allows inconsistent verdicts to stand and requires independent sufficiency review Acquittal of first-degree means State failed to prove an essential element of second-degree; conviction must be vacated An acquittal does not automatically vacate a lesser-mitigated conviction; inconsistent verdicts are erroneous but not constitutional error; affirm after independent sufficiency review
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support second-degree murder despite acquittal on first-degree Jury may have mistakenly favored defendant on one count; independent review of evidence supports conviction The acquittal demonstrates insufficiency for second-degree and precludes conviction Independent review found evidence sufficient to support a rational finding of second-degree murder beyond reasonable doubt
Whether entry of inconsistent verdicts violated defendant’s substantial rights Inconsistent verdicts not of constitutional magnitude per Powell; defendant protected by sufficiency review Entry of conviction inconsistent with acquittal denied fair trial and statutory scheme; conviction must be reversed Error in inconsistent verdicts did not deny substantial right; conviction affirmed after sufficiency review

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Parker, 223 Ill. 2d 494 (2006) (acquittal of first-degree murder precludes jury from considering second-degree when jury followed instructions)
  • United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (1984) (inconsistent jury verdicts are cognizable error but not of constitutional magnitude; requires independent sufficiency review)
  • People v. Jones, 207 Ill. 2d 122 (2003) (Illinois applies Powell to allow conviction on one count despite acquittal on another when verdicts inconsistent)
  • People v. Klingenberg, 172 Ill. 2d 270 (1996) (discussed inconsistency in Illinois precedent prior to being overruled by later holdings)
  • People v. Herron, 215 Ill. 2d 167 (2005) (forfeiture rule: failure to object and raise issue in posttrial motion forfeits review)
  • People v. Jeffries, 164 Ill. 2d 104 (1995) (recognizes second-degree murder as a lesser mitigated offense of first-degree murder)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Brown
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: May 16, 2017
Citation: 79 N.E.3d 735
Docket Number: 3-14-0514
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.