History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Beman
243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 802
| Cal. Ct. App. 5th | 2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Eric Beman pleaded no contest to conspiracy to commit human trafficking (count 1, Jan 2006–Apr 2013) and to two substantive human trafficking counts (counts 14, 17) involving Victim 1 in 2011.
  • The charged conspiracy involved at least three victims (Victims 1–3) and numerous overt acts over seven-plus years, including beatings, forced prostitution, kidnapping, trading/selling victims, and threats with weapons.
  • Defendant admitted multiple overt acts in the conspiracy plea relating to Victims 1–3, including assaults, confinement, and retrieving Victim 1 at gunpoint from a codefendant.
  • The trial court sentenced defendant to 14 years for the conspiracy and two consecutive 16‑month terms for the two human‑trafficking counts, for a total of 16 years, 8 months.
  • On appeal, defendant argued Penal Code § 654 barred punishment for the two substantive trafficking counts in addition to the conspiracy sentence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 654 bars punishment for substantive human‑trafficking counts in addition to conspiracy sentence Prosecution: conspiracy had broader objectives and multiple victims beyond the specific 2011 trafficking of Victim 1, so separate punishment is permissible Beman: conspiracy punishment must be stayed under § 654 because it had the same objective as the substantive offenses (trafficking of Victim 1) Court affirmed: § 654 does not bar sentencing on both conspiracy and the two substantive counts because the conspiracy encompassed broader objectives and multiple victims over many years

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Ramirez, 189 Cal.App.3d 603 (1987) (conspiracy punishment barred when conspiracy's only objective is the punished substantive offense)
  • People v. Russo, 25 Cal.4th 1124 (2001) (discussed in Ramirez authority context)
  • People v. Vargas, 91 Cal.App.4th 506 (2001) (conspiracy may be punished along with a substantive offense when conspiracy targets additional victims)
  • People v. Collins, 242 Cal.App.2d 626 (1966) (conspiracy punishable with substantive offenses where conspiracy objectives extended beyond those offenses)
  • People v. Amadio, 22 Cal.App.3d 7 (1971) (same: conspiracy involved more conduct than the specific substantive counts)
  • People v. Briones, 167 Cal.App.4th 524 (2008) (conspiracy punishment stayed where conspiracy had no objective apart from the specific substantive drug possession offenses)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Beman
Court Name: California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Date Published: Feb 21, 2019
Citation: 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 802
Docket Number: A153841
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App. 5th