People v. Bell
989 N.E.2d 1211
Ill. App. Ct.2013Background
- defendant Ed Bell was convicted of first-degree murder in 1995 and sentenced to life imprisonment.
- he challenged his sentence as void on postconviction grounds; the challenge hinges on grand jury impaneling and swearing.
- the indictment was returned by a grand jury for two counts of murder and after trial Bell was convicted and sentenced.
- Bell filed multiple postconviction petitions; in 2012 he sought leave to file his fifth successive petition alleging the life sentence was void.
- the court held that the indictment appeared facially valid and the record did not establish that the grand jury was not impaneled or sworn; the conviction was affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the grand jury was impaneled and sworn to support the indictment | Bell argues no certificate showing impaneling; absence means no jurisdiction | State has burden to show grand jury impaneled/sworn; record lacking proves voidness | Indictment valid on face; record insufficient to prove lack of impaneling/swearing |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Whitlow, 89 Ill. 2d 322 (1982) (indictment presumed valid on face of record)
- People v. Sullivan, 21 Ill. 2d 232 (1961) (jurisdictional challenges may be raised at any time)
- People v. Lopez, 229 Ill. 2d 322 (2008) (record must be complete to review; doubts resolved against defendant when record incomplete)
- People v. Toft, 355 Ill. App. 3d 1102 (2005) (review of proceedings requires transcript or bystander’s report when none exists)
- People v. Bragg, 126 Ill. App. 3d 826 (1984) (doubt about grand jury proceedings resolved against defendant without transcript)
- People v. Gibbs, 413 Ill. 154 (1952) (cannot presume grand jury authority absent positive proof)
