History
  • No items yet
midpage
2024 IL App (1st) 221138
Ill. App. Ct.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Lamar Atkins was stopped by police in Chicago, who discovered a firearm in his vehicle; Atkins was the sole occupant and had a prior felony conviction.
  • He was charged and found guilty by a jury of unlawfully possessing a weapon as a felon under 720 ILCS 5/24-1.1(a).
  • Before trial, Atkins moved to suppress evidence obtained during the search, but the court found probable cause and denied the motion.
  • Atkins was sentenced to 26 months' imprisonment and appealed the conviction, raising a facial constitutional challenge to the statute under the Second Amendment based on the Bruen decision.
  • He argued that the felon-in-possession statute is inconsistent with historical firearm regulations, as newly interpreted by recent Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constitutionality of felon-in-possession law Atkins: Law violates Second Amendment on its face (post-Bruen). State: Law is constitutional, consistent with history/tradition. Statute is constitutional; conviction affirmed.
Applicability of Bruen to felons Atkins: Plain text of Second Amendment covers all, including felons State: Bruen applies to law-abiding citizens, not felons. Bruen does not apply to felons; law-abiding citizens only.
Historical support for status-based bans Atkins: No founding-era tradition for permanent bans on felons. State: Historical tradition allows legislature to disarm felons. There is historical basis for status-based firearm restrictions.
Distinction between violent/nonviolent felons Atkins: Law makes no distinction, imposes total ban on all felons. State: Constitutionality extends to nonviolent and violent felons. No such distinction required, statute applies to all felons.

Key Cases Cited

  • District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (U.S. 2008) (recognized individual right to possess firearms, subject to longstanding prohibitions)
  • McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (U.S. 2010) (incorporated Second Amendment right to states)
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2022) (set new standard for evaluating firearm regulations under Second Amendment)
  • United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. _ (U.S. 2024) (reaffirmed constitutionality of laws prohibiting felons and those mentally ill from possessing firearms)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Atkins
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Nov 14, 2024
Citations: 2024 IL App (1st) 221138; 2024 IL App (1st) 221138-U; 1-22-1138
Docket Number: 1-22-1138
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    People v. Atkins, 2024 IL App (1st) 221138