People of Michigan v. Juan T Walker
332491
| Mich. Ct. App. | Oct 12, 2017Background
- In 2001 Walker was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder (life without parole) and felony-firearm; convictions were previously affirmed and cert. denied.
- In 2011 Walker moved for relief after discovering his trial counsel had not informed him of a prosecutor’s plea offer to second-degree murder (25–50 years) plus two years for felony-firearm.
- The Michigan Supreme Court remanded for a Ginther evidentiary hearing to test an ineffective-assistance claim under Strickland and the Lafler/Frye framework.
- At the Ginther hearing the trial court found counsel deficient for failing to convey the offer, and later granted relief, ordering the prosecution to reoffer the plea; Walker pleaded guilty and was resentenced per the offer.
- On appeal the prosecution challenged the prejudice element — specifically that Walker failed to show a reasonable probability he would have accepted the plea given his consistent claims of innocence.
- The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, holding the trial court clearly erred and abused its discretion by finding prejudice without adequate, case-specific findings that Walker would have accepted the plea.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (People) | Defendant's Argument (Walker) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Walker received ineffective assistance because counsel failed to convey the plea offer | Trial court erred to the extent it overlooked credibility issues; but prosecution concedes counsel likely failed to convey offer (focus on prejudice) | Counsel failed to inform Walker of the plea offer, satisfying deficient-performance prong | Trial court did not clearly err finding counsel deficient; that prong stands (not the central dispute on appeal) |
| Whether Walker was prejudiced — reasonable probability he would have accepted the plea | Walker’s expressed innocence and inconsistent testimony show he would not likely have accepted the plea; thus no prejudice | Walker would have accepted plea to avoid life without parole; his later acceptance supports prejudice | Reversed: trial court clearly erred and abused discretion in finding prejudice because it failed to make case-specific findings that Walker would have accepted the plea |
Key Cases Cited
- Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012) (prejudice test and remedy when counsel’s errors cause loss of a plea offer)
- Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012) (defendant must show reasonable probability he would have accepted offer not conveyed)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong ineffective-assistance standard)
- People v. Douglas, 496 Mich. 557 (2014) (defendant’s professed innocence can undercut claim he would have accepted a plea)
- People v. Carbin, 463 Mich. 590 (2001) (Michigan articulation of Strickland standard)
