History
  • No items yet
midpage
People of Michigan v. David Lee Swanigan
330271
| Mich. Ct. App. | Apr 11, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • JA was assaulted during a purse snatching; the robber brandished a handgun and fled after a bystander interfered.
  • A pursuing officer observed defendant, who fit the suspect description, running from the scene and dropping a cell phone and later discarding a metal object.
  • A .32-caliber handgun was recovered from a restaurant roof and a black hooded sweatshirt resembling the attacker’s was identified by JA.
  • Defendant was convicted of felon in possession and felony-firearm, but acquitted of armed robbery and a related felony-firearm charge.
  • Defendant challenged counsel substitution, sufficiency of evidence, constitutional bear-arms issues, and PSIR accuracy; the trial court addressed the PSIR objections at sentencing.
  • The appellate court affirmed the convictions and rejected each challenged issue.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Right to substitute counsel Swanigan requested substitute counsel due to ineffectiveness. Court should have appointed substitute counsel upon request. No abuse; defendant did not request substitute counsel.
Constitutionality of felon-in-possession/felony-firearm Right to bear arms allows restrictions on felons; statute constitutional. Statutes overly broad and infringe right to self-defense. Statutes constitutional; no error to sustain convictions.
PSIR correction PSIR contained irrelevant/incorrect armed-robbery references. Information about acquitted conduct should be removed. Court acted within discretion; information upheld and incorporated.
Sufficiency of the evidence There was sufficient evidence of firearm possession by defendant. Lack of fingerprint/ dash-cam corroboration undermines sufficiency. Sufficient evidence supported felon-in-possession and felony-firearm convictions.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Traylor, 245 Mich App 460 (2001) (abuse-of-discretion standard for substitution of counsel)
  • People v. Mack, 190 Mich App 7 (1991) (good-cause standard for appointment of substitute counsel)
  • People v. Lucey, 287 Mich App 267 (2010) (procedure for correcting PSIR; sentencing court's discretion)
  • People v. Compagnari, 233 Mich App 233 (1998) (courts may consider acquitted conduct at sentencing)
  • United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997) (courts may consider conduct underlying charges acquitted by preponderance)
  • People v. Deroche, 299 Mich App 301 (2013) (felon-in-possession upholds constitutionality under Heller)
  • People v. Powell, 303 Mich App 271 (2013) (upholds felon-in-possession/felony-firearm constitutionality)
  • People v. Dupree, 486 Mich 693 (2010) (self-defense defense as to felon-in-possession context)
  • Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) (framework for evaluating firearm restrictions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People of Michigan v. David Lee Swanigan
Court Name: Michigan Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 11, 2017
Docket Number: 330271
Court Abbreviation: Mich. Ct. App.