People of Michigan v. Alenna Marie Rocafort
321804
Mich. Ct. App.Jan 2, 2018Background
- Defendant (Alenna Rocafort) was convicted by a jury of unlawful manufacture of marijuana, possession with intent to deliver, and maintaining a drug house; sentenced to 24 months’ probation.
- On initial appeal this Court affirmed; the Michigan Supreme Court remanded for reconsideration in light of People v Manuel.
- At the time police seized the marijuana, defendant had harvested plants and placed leaves in canisters to dry; the trial court found the material "largely dried" but still required another day or two of drying.
- The seized material weighed nearly six pounds in its largely-dried state; the MMMA entitles a qualifying patient/primary caregiver to possess up to 15 ounces of "usable" marijuana, defined as the dried leaves.
- The factual dispute focused on whether marijuana still in the drying process qualifies as "usable" marijuana for MMMA immunity purposes.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether marijuana seized while drying constitutes "usable" marijuana under the MMMA | Marijuana in its largely-dried state is usable and exceeds MMMA limits, supporting prosecution | Material still in the drying process is not "usable" marijuana and defendant is entitled to MMMA §4 immunity | Court held drying-stage marijuana is not "usable"; defendant entitled to immunity and charges must be dismissed |
Key Cases Cited
- People v Manuel, 319 Mich. App. 291 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017) (held marijuana still undergoing drying is not "usable" under the MMMA and defendant entitled to §4 immunity)
- People v Carruthers, 301 Mich. App. 590 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) (addressed whether marijuana-infused edibles constituted "usable" marijuana; distinguished in remand order)
