History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 COA 161
Colo. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Dependency and neglect case involving O.C. and the child's maternal grandfather and step-grandmother who appeal the denial of their intervention motions.
  • Grandparents first sought intervention in Oct 2010 under C.R.C.P. 24(a)-(b); county opposed and trial court denied.
  • In July 2011, county moved to place O.C. with grandfather, withdrew; grandfather sought special respondent/intervention; court denied.
  • January 2012, county moved to terminate parental rights; grandparents again sought to intervene; court denied.
  • Issue of finality: Feigin holds denial of intervention as a matter of right is final and appealable.
  • Court reverses and remands to allow grandfather and grandmother to intervene under § 19-3-507(5)(a).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether grandparents have a right to intervene as a matter of right under §19-3-507(5)(a). Grandparents claim §19-3-507(5)(a) grants intervention to interested parties after adjudication. County/GAL contend only certain categories meet the statute's requirements and the court may deny. Yes; grandparents have the right to intervene as a matter of right.
Whether the denial of intervention is a final, appealable order. Feigin supports treating denial as final to prevent prejudicing rights. Argue not final because it does not terminate parental rights. Yes, the denial is final and appealable.
Whether the three-month custody requirement applies to all intervenors or only foster parents. Statutory ambiguity; grandparents should not be barred by custody duration. Three-month custody requirement should apply to all, restricting grandparents. Three-month rule applies only to foster parents; grandparents may intervene without prior custody.

Key Cases Cited

  • Feigin v. Alexa Group, Ltd., 19 P.3d 23 (Colo. 2001) (denial of intervention as a matter of right is final and appealable)
  • People in Interest of M.D.C.M., 522 P.2d 1234 (Colo. App. 1974) (interested parties include relatives with custodial experience)
  • People in Interest of C.P., 524 P.2d 816 (Colo. App. 1974) (grandmother entitled to intervene as an interested party at dispositional stage)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People ex rel. O.C.
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 27, 2012
Citations: 2012 COA 161; 312 P.3d 226; 2012 WL 4451000; 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 1569; No. 12CA0649
Docket Number: No. 12CA0649
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    People ex rel. O.C., 2012 COA 161