History
  • No items yet
midpage
People ex rel. N.G.
2012 COA 131
| Colo. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • DHS removed N.G. in 2010 due to mother's drug use; child placed with maternal uncle C.G.
  • Father J.P.W. learned of removal, sought placement and custody; paternity confirmed.
  • Mother and DHS deferred adjudication for mother and father with a six-month deferral; father admitted paragraph 4(d).
  • Magistrate allocated parental responsibilities to uncle without revoking father’s deferred adjudication or adjudicating father.
  • District court later denied review and treated N.D.V. precedent as controlling, then remanded; issues centered on Troxel presumption and parental rights.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether adjudication are required before permanent custody allocations Father argues adjudication as to him was required DHS/County argues adjudication as to father unnecessary because mother was adjudicated Adjudication as to both parents required; allocation to uncle vacated
Troxel presumption applicability during deferred adjudication Father retains Troxel presumption as fit parent State may intervene despite presumption when neglect shown Troxel presumption ordinarily survives during deferral; requires careful consideration on remand
Effect of no-fault admission without adjudication Admission supports removal despite no adjudication Admission alone justifies disposition under N.D.V. No automatic disposition; need adjudication and consideration of new evidence on remand
Waiver of adjudicatory rights by father Admission under deferral waives right to adjudication Waiver not proven; advisement and voluntary waiver required No waiver; rights reserved; adjudicatory hearing needed on remand

Key Cases Cited

  • L.L. v. People, 10 P.3d 1271 (Colo. 2000) (adjudication status and parental rights standard in dependency cases)
  • K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006) (adjudication status and ongoing inquiry in deferred adjudications)
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000) (fundamental right of fit parent; Troxel presumption in custody matters)
  • People in Interest of S.B., 742 P.2d 939 (Colo. App. 1987) (right to jury determination at adjudicatory stage; status inquiry)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: People ex rel. N.G.
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 2, 2012
Citation: 2012 COA 131
Docket Number: No. 12CA0417
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.