History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peo v. Freyta-Duran
22CA1444
Colo. Ct. App.
Mar 20, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Carla D. Freyta-Duran was convicted by a jury of first degree criminal trespass (of a dwelling) and two counts of third degree assault, following an incident at her former partner Joseph Maynes’s home.
  • After an eight-year relationship ended, Freyta-Duran entered Maynes' home—where he lived with his new partner, Regina Deleon—and confronted him about money she believed was stolen by Maynes’s son.
  • During the altercation, Freyta-Duran kicked open a bedroom door, threw items, and hit both Maynes and Deleon.
  • She was charged with second degree burglary and third degree assault as acts of domestic violence; she was convicted of the lesser offense of criminal trespass and both assault counts.
  • On appeal, Freyta-Duran challenged the admission of police testimony, the use of other acts evidence, prosecutorial conduct during closing arguments, and raised cumulative error concerns.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of Officer Testimony Proper investigative testimony, not bolstering. Officer testimony improperly bolstered victims' accounts. Testimony allowed; did not improperly bolster.
Admission of Other Acts Evidence No error; evidence was defense-invited through cross-examination. Reference to attempted car damage was inadmissible other acts. Error, if any, was invited and not addressed.
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Argument Arguments were based on evidence and permissible rhetoric. Prosecutor misled jury, improperly vouched, trivialized burden. No plain error or misconduct found.
Cumulative Error No cumulative error since no individual error found. Multiple errors denied a fair trial. Cumulative error doctrine not applicable.

Key Cases Cited

  • Domingo-Gomez v. People, 125 P.3d 1043 (Colo. 2005) (standards for prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument)
  • People v. Rector, 248 P.3d 1196 (Colo. 2011) (limits of witness testimony on ultimate issues)
  • People v. Davis, 2013 CO 57 (Colo. 2013) (jury’s ability to assess credibility when witnesses testify)
  • Howard-Walker v. People, 2019 CO 69 (Colo. 2019) (cumulative error doctrine explanation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Peo v. Freyta-Duran
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 20, 2025
Docket Number: 22CA1444
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.