History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
772 F.3d 111
| 2d Cir. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Cheyne SIV collapse and rating by S&P and Moody's; Morgan Stanley involved in structuring and marketing of notes; Cheyne SIV notes issued to sophisticated investors; PSERS and Commerzbank joined later as plaintiffs; district court denied class certification, dismissed Commerzbank standing and PSERS for lack of diversity; appellate court remanded on standing and preserved certification questions to New York Court of Appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is PSERS properly dismissed for lack of complete diversity? PSERS is an arm of Pennsylvania, non-diverse; supplemental jurisdiction should apply. Complete diversity required; PSERS destroys diversity and jurisdiction. Yes; PSERS dismissal affirmed.
Was the district court abuse in denying class certification? Common issues predominate; numerosity sufficient for class. Numerosity and predominance not met; individual issues overwhelm. No abuse; denial affirmed.
Can Commerzbank establish standing via assignment of fraud claims, and can Morgan Stanley be liable if standing exists? Transfers from DAF to Dresdner to Commerzbank conferstanding; Morgan Stanley aided/caused fraud. Standing not shown; misstatement at issue attributed to rating agencies; liability uncertain. Standing question unsettled; certification to NY Court of Appeals warranted; if standing, further question on Morgan Stanley liability may be certified.

Key Cases Cited

  • Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Servs., Inc., 545 U.S. 546 (U.S. 2005) (complete diversity is an absolute prerequisite to federal jurisdiction and can contaminate the action when destroyed by a non-diverse party)
  • Merrill Lynch & Co. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc., 500 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2007) (contamination theory; diversity requirements track bright-line rule)
  • Robidoux v. Celani, 987 F.2d 931 (2d Cir. 1993) (Robidoux factors inform joinder vs. class certification decisions)
  • In re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litig., 631 F.3d 537 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (complete diversity principle reaffirmed after Exxon)
  • Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Trust Funds, 133 S. Ct. 1184 (2013) (fraud-on-the-market-like considerations do not collapse reliance in NY state law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Oct 31, 2014
Citation: 772 F.3d 111
Docket Number: 13-2095-cv (L)
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.