Pelosi v. Pelosi
50 A.3d 795
R.I.2012Background
- The plaintiff-wife Kathleen Pelosi and the pro se defendant-husband Milton Pelosi were married in 1981 and have one child.
- The wife filed for divorce on May 6, 2003, claiming irreconcilable differences.
- An interlocutory decision granting divorce and related issues was entered April 19, 2004; a final judgment of divorce followed October 25, 2004.
- An amended final judgment nunc pro tunc to October 25, 2004 was entered October 1, 2007, reflecting undisposed issues.
- The defendant, pro se, moved under Rule 60 to vacate the interlocutory decision and final judgment on September 30, 2008; the motion was denied after hearings in 2009.
- The plaintiff sought dismissal of Pelosi’s appeal in May 2010 for failure to perfect the record, and the Family Court granted the dismissal on September 13, 2010; the appeal was thereafter affirmed by this Court.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the dismissal of the appeal for failure to perfect the record was proper. | Pelosi | Pelosi | No abuse; defendant failed to timely transmit the record; not excusable neglect. |
Key Cases Cited
- Gallant v. Small Business Loan Fund Corp., 795 A.2d 531 (R.I.2002) (failure to perfect an appeal may justify dismissal when untimely transmission of the record)
- Estate of Mitchell v. Gorman, 970 A.2d 1 (R.I.2009) (Rule 11 extensions; trial court may manage timing of record transmission)
- Sentas v. Sentas, 911 A.2d 266 (R.I.2006) (dismissal for failure to comply with appellate rules allowed; excusable neglect considered)
- Daniel v. Cross, 749 A.2d 6 (R.I.2000) (failure to perfect appeal cited as grounds for dismissal)
- Valkoun v. Frizzle, 973 A.2d 566 (R.I.2009) (transcript timing and extensions; record transmission responsibility on appellant)
