History
  • No items yet
midpage
(PC) Shavers v. Taber
2:21-cv-01734
E.D. Cal.
Nov 15, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Jesse Lee Shavers, Jr., a state prisoner, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis.
  • The case concerns claims against multiple defendants, including Taber and D. Kelsey.
  • The magistrate judge screened the fourth amended complaint and found that only the claims against Taber should proceed.
  • Claims against D. Kelsey were recommended for dismissal due to insufficient factual allegations of involvement with the confiscation of plaintiff's medical devices or racial animus.
  • The court noted this was the plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and withheld further leave to amend.
  • No objections to the magistrate’s recommendations were filed by any party within the required period.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of allegations against D. Kelsey Kelsey engaged in a conspiracy leading to confiscation of medical devices; actions motivated by racial animus No specific or factual allegations connecting Kelsey to deprivation or racial animus Dismissed claims against Kelsey without leave to amend
Leave to amend fourth amended complaint Further leave to amend should be granted Further amendment is unwarranted given repeated failure Leave to amend denied
Proceeding against defendant Taber Claims are adequately pled against Taber N/A Claims against Taber may proceed
Failure to object to magistrate’s findings and recommendations N/A N/A Findings adopted in full

Key Cases Cited

No officially reported cases were cited in this opinion.

Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: (PC) Shavers v. Taber
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Nov 15, 2024
Docket Number: 2:21-cv-01734
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.