(PC) Shavers v. Taber
2:21-cv-01734
E.D. Cal.Nov 15, 2024Background
- Jesse Lee Shavers, Jr., a state prisoner, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis.
- The case concerns claims against multiple defendants, including Taber and D. Kelsey.
- The magistrate judge screened the fourth amended complaint and found that only the claims against Taber should proceed.
- Claims against D. Kelsey were recommended for dismissal due to insufficient factual allegations of involvement with the confiscation of plaintiff's medical devices or racial animus.
- The court noted this was the plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and withheld further leave to amend.
- No objections to the magistrate’s recommendations were filed by any party within the required period.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of allegations against D. Kelsey | Kelsey engaged in a conspiracy leading to confiscation of medical devices; actions motivated by racial animus | No specific or factual allegations connecting Kelsey to deprivation or racial animus | Dismissed claims against Kelsey without leave to amend |
| Leave to amend fourth amended complaint | Further leave to amend should be granted | Further amendment is unwarranted given repeated failure | Leave to amend denied |
| Proceeding against defendant Taber | Claims are adequately pled against Taber | N/A | Claims against Taber may proceed |
| Failure to object to magistrate’s findings and recommendations | N/A | N/A | Findings adopted in full |
Key Cases Cited
No officially reported cases were cited in this opinion.
